New design : implementation independent API

[blegat]

Rewrite of the code, it is now an implementation independent API. The implementation has been moved to DynamicPolynomials. The API is inspired from both DynamicPolynomials and TypedPolynomials.
There is a start of documentation of the API.
Still to do:

• substitution
• make TypedPolynomials pass the tests
• run the tests for both TypedPolynomials and DynamicPolynomials on runtests.jl of this package

@rdeits What would you think of saying that variables gives the variables of nonzero exponent and vars gives all the variables of the type ?

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-67.6%) to 26.41% when pulling d9edc0c on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #41 into master will increase coverage by 4.27%.
The diff coverage is 98.1%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #41      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.01%   98.28%   +4.27%     
==========================================
  Files          17       12       -5     
  Lines        1069      408     -661     
==========================================
- Hits         1005      401     -604     
+ Misses         64        7      -57

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/show.jl	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
src/rational.jl	100% <100%> (+10%)	⬆️
src/zip.jl	100% <100%> (ø)
src/div.jl	100% <100%> (+16.66%)	⬆️
src/comp.jl	100% <100%> (+2.25%)	⬆️
src/operators.jl	100% <100%> (ø)
src/mono.jl	100% <100%> (+6%)	⬆️
src/conversion.jl	100% <100%> (ø)
src/term.jl	100% <100%> (ø)
src/diff.jl	100% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
... and 8 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 83297a5...c7bec44. Read the comment docs.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-61.9%) to 32.08% when pulling 122c35e on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-55.2%) to 38.765% when pulling 2f95508 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-55.2%) to 38.765% when pulling 2f95508 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-53.2%) to 40.786% when pulling bde13a5 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-53.2%) to 40.786% when pulling bde13a5 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-49.5%) to 44.526% when pulling fae284b on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-45.09%) to 48.921% when pulling 1daada8 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-43.4%) to 50.597% when pulling af934b2 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-38.5%) to 55.476% when pulling a009287 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-33.0%) to 61.02% when pulling 6dc4417 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[saschatimme]

@rdeits I ran into the same Julia issue (even without reexport). It was not deterministic, but I think after I removed ˋRevise.jlˋ from my ˋjuliarc.jlˋ it didn’t occur again.

[blegat]

I also keep getting hit by JuliaLang/julia#22355. When this happens, I use Julia v0.7. Once I do a few changes this usually disappears but then it appears a few changes later :-P They seem to say that a fix is being backported to the next bug fix release of Julia v0.6.

[blegat]

We may strip out matpoly.jl from MultivariatePolynomials and put it in SumOfSquares.jl. Making this package lighter might make these failures less frequent.

[saschatimme]

algebraicset.jl also? That seems quite self contained.

[blegat]

Both TypedPolynomials and DynamicPolynomials are passing all the tests.
@rdeits Ok to merge this PR ?
I have removed MatPolynomial, SOSPolynomials and algebraic set stuff. The two first will be moved to SumOfSquares while the last will be moved to SemialgebraicSets.jl unless someone has a better name.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-14.5%) to 79.475% when pulling 987e6d8 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-8.7%) to 85.279% when pulling c6ebd42 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage decreased (-8.7%) to 85.279% when pulling c6ebd42 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 94.177% when pulling 45bbc00 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+1.2%) to 95.202% when pulling fa66e08 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+2.5%) to 96.56% when pulling 0567d8c on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+3.3%) to 97.304% when pulling 6875015 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+4.3%) to 98.284% when pulling bdf5351 on typed into 83297a5 on master.

[coveralls]

Coverage increased (+5.5%) to 99.507% when pulling c7bec44 on typed into 83297a5 on master.