Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/petra ci checks #5157

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Jun 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ignazio-bovo
Copy link
Collaborator

@ignazio-bovo ignazio-bovo commented May 30, 2024

SSIA:

  • fix Mac OS checks failing
  • remove runtime upgrade check via the fork-off tool (as the joystream state is too large for the GH runner and the test will be halted in any case)
  • set pallet frozen status
  • update pallet token constraints
  • set era payout damping factor
  • decrease council budget
  • runtime node package version bump to 2004

Argo pallet update constraints network test case will be added soon in a future PR

@ignazio-bovo ignazio-bovo force-pushed the fix/petra-ci-checks branch from 2783470 to e53fabb Compare May 30, 2024 15:06
@ignazio-bovo ignazio-bovo force-pushed the fix/petra-ci-checks branch from e53fabb to 9f42316 Compare May 30, 2024 15:07
Copy link
Collaborator

@kdembler kdembler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@kdembler kdembler merged commit a59729b into Joystream:petra Jun 5, 2024
21 of 23 checks passed
@@ -299,7 +372,7 @@ export class CreateProposalsFixture extends StandardizedFixture {
}

protected assertQueryNodeEventIsValid(qEvent: ProposalCreatedEventFieldsFragment, i: number): void {
// TODO: https://github.com/Joystream/joystream/issues/2457
// Inetntionally left blank
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Intentionally"

Copy link
Contributor

@freakstatic freakstatic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants