Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

when duplicate form remove removed_properties #702

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 13, 2025

Conversation

chiragchhatrala
Copy link
Collaborator

@chiragchhatrala chiragchhatrala commented Feb 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated the form duplication process to reset previously removed properties, ensuring duplicated forms start with a clean slate.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the duplication logic in the FormController by adding a line in the duplicate method. When a form is duplicated, the new copy explicitly sets its removed_properties attribute to an empty array. This change ensures that any properties previously removed in the original form do not carry over to the duplicate. The overall class structure and other methods remain unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
api/app/Http/Controllers/Forms/FormController.php Modified the duplicate method to reset removed_properties to an empty array during the duplication process.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant FC as FormController
    participant DF as DuplicatedForm

    U->>FC: Call duplicate(id)
    FC->>DF: Create duplicate of original form
    DF-->>FC: Duplicate created with removed_properties = []
    FC-->>U: Return duplicated form
Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit hopping with glee,
Duplicated forms now fresh and free,
Removed properties vanish out of sight,
Code leaps with joy into the light,
Enjoy the clean slate, oh what a delight!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 66a3771 and 30d3583.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • api/app/Http/Controllers/Forms/FormController.php (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • api/app/Http/Controllers/Forms/FormController.php
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Build the Nuxt app

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@JhumanJ JhumanJ merged commit 33bd85f into main Feb 13, 2025
7 checks passed
@JhumanJ JhumanJ deleted the 199a6-when-duplicate-remove-removed_properties branch February 13, 2025 14:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants