Now rules which were imported via 'include' are supported too.

Resolves: #429

src/test/resources/features/highlighting/rule_ingeritance_marker_provider.feature

@@ -90,6 +90,72 @@ Feature: tests line marker provider in case of rule inheritance
     Then I expect marker of overriding section with references:
       | NAME   | boo.smk |
       | NAME_2 | boo.smk |
+    Examples:
+      | rule_like  |
+      | rule       |
+      | checkpoint |
+
+  Scenario Outline: Rule inheritance in case of include usage
+    Given a snakemake project
+    And a file "doo.smk" with text
+    """
+    <rule_like> NAME:
+      input: "name_inp"
+
+    <rule_like> NAME_2:
+      input: "name_2_inp"
+    """
+    And a file "boo.smk" with text
+    """
+    include: "doo.smk"
+    """
+    Given I open a file "foo.smk" with text
+    """
+    module MODULE:
+      snakefile: "boo.smk"
+
+    use rule NAME from MODULE as NAME_3 with:
+      threads: 1
+
+    use rule NAME from MODULE as NAME_4 with:
+      threads: 2
+
+    use rule NAME_2 as INCORRECT_USE_CASE with:
+      thread: 3
+
+    use rule NAME, NAME_2 from MODULE as EXPLICIT_DEFINITION_OF_*
+
+    use rule * from MODULE as IMPLICIT_DEFINITION_OF_*
+    """
+    When I change current file to <doo.smk>
+    And I put the caret at NAME:
+    Then I expect marker of overridden section with references:
+      | NAME_3                   | foo.smk |
+      | NAME_4                   | foo.smk |
+      | EXPLICIT_DEFINITION_OF_* | foo.smk |
+      | IMPLICIT_DEFINITION_OF_* | foo.smk |
+    When I change current file to <doo.smk>
+    And I put the caret at NAME_2:
+    Then I expect marker of overridden section with references:
+      | EXPLICIT_DEFINITION_OF_* | foo.smk |
+      | IMPLICIT_DEFINITION_OF_* | foo.smk |
+    When I change current file to <foo.smk>
+    And I put the caret at NAME_3
+    Then I expect marker of overriding section with references:
+      | NAME | doo.smk |
+    When I put the caret at NAME_4
+    Then I expect marker of overriding section with references:
+      | NAME | doo.smk |
+    When I put the caret at INCORRECT_USE_CASE
+    Then I expect no markers
+    When I put the caret at EXPLICIT_DEFINITION_OF_*
+    Then I expect marker of overriding section with references:
+      | NAME   | doo.smk |
+      | NAME_2 | doo.smk |
+    When I put the caret at IMPLICIT_DEFINITION_OF_*
+    Then I expect marker of overriding section with references:
+      | NAME   | doo.smk |
+      | NAME_2 | doo.smk |
     Examples:
       | rule_like  |
       | rule       |