-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(monorepo): separate each loader into its own package #23
Conversation
but export as generic names
Feedback
Is |
I added backport requests to
I don't understand—isn't that what I did? (The package is
Yes, very much: That's what prevents dev files getting published. |
@AugustinMauroy I added some commits on top of a WIP commit. I'll finish my WIP commit, then cherry-pick your stuff back on top, and then force-push. |
fe623b4
to
edd0fa3
Compare
04b3a4d
to
f7d9766
Compare
yup my bad I didn't see you remove it from sub packages |
is it mean loader will only work for 23.2 ??? (for example nodejs.org still on 20) |
For As-is, we can't release this change until EDIT: I spoke with Antoine, and |
f7d9766
to
0bbdcce
Compare
this isolates them into different threads to avoid cross-contamination/interference.
for test orchestration
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
now we can put in gitignore because we publish it with GA
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure: I committed it because a comment is supposed to get posted with a coverage diff. I think in order to do that, coverage needs to get committed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Honslty I'm not sure. It's first time I work on a package. But with jest we didn't commit the coverage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM ! Just one remaining thing should we merge before back port or wait backport.
Or merge but wait for publishing.
Any strong opinions
WOW happy to see this happened ! |
closes #19