-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add simple unit tests #7696
Add simple unit tests #7696
Conversation
Add elemental test case for formatters, to check that a valid input remains unmodified.
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ void extractURLFormLink() { | |||
formatter.format("away.php?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwikipedia.org&a=snippet")); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
@Test | |||
void validURLUnmodified() { | |||
// the caller has to pay attention that this does not happen |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What should not happen? Maybe just remove the comment.
The call seems IMHO legal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's on me, I copy-pasted and forgot to remove it.
@@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ void extractURLFormLink() { | |||
formatter.format("away.php?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwikipedia.org&a=snippet")); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
@Test | |||
void validURLUnmodified() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We try to gradually migrate to Google's casing rules: https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html#s5.3-camel-case
Thus, please introduce defined camel case
void validURLUnmodified() { | |
void validUrlUnmodified() { |
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ public void setUp() { | |||
|
|||
@Test | |||
public void test() { | |||
assertEquals("lower", formatter.format("lower")); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you maybe change that to a paramterized test? We aim for having one assertion per test case. See also #6207
Address the requested changes from #7696
I addressed the requested changes in the last commit, should be all good now. |
* upstream/main: (71 commits) [Bot] Update CSL styles (#7735) Fix for issue 6966: open all files of multiple entries (#7709) Add simple unit tests (#7696) Add simple unit tests (#7543) Update check-outdated-dependencies.yml Added preset for new entry keybindings and reintroduced defaults (#7705) Select the entry which has smaller dictonary order when merge (#7708) Update CHANGELOG.md fix: make more fields, fomatters, ids and languages sorted by alphabetical order (#7717) Bump libreoffice from 7.1.2 to 7.1.3 (#7721) Bump unoloader from 7.1.2 to 7.1.3 (#7724) Bump org.beryx.jlink from 2.23.7 to 2.23.8 (#7723) Bump org.openjfx.javafxplugin from 0.0.9 to 0.0.10 (#7725) fix: make fields sorted by lexicographical order (#7711) Fix tests Refactoring existing unit tests (#7687) Refactoring and addition of unit tests (#7581) Refactor simple Unit Tests (#7571) Add simple unit tests (#7544) add and extend unit tests (#7685) ...
This pull request contributes to issue #6207, which is to add more unit tests or improve existing ones.
I added the trivial, but important, test case, that the output should remain unmodified in case the input was already valid.
Tests extended:
CHANGELOG.md
described in a way that is understandable for the average user (if applicable)