Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add paging support #6236

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 4, 2020
Merged

Add paging support #6236

merged 4 commits into from
Nov 4, 2020

Conversation

koppor
Copy link
Member

@koppor koppor commented Apr 2, 2020

By @JoHaHu. Let's discuss how to go on here.

Refs #5518.

* added paging interface

* use collection instead of list

* added default page size and documentation

* removes interfaces from expected class list

* Added paging support for ADS fetcher

* removes search by page

* make page immutable

* added test case for invalid authors
@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez changed the title Add paging support [WIP] Add paging support Apr 10, 2020
@tobiasdiez tobiasdiez marked this pull request as draft April 17, 2020 16:07
@koppor koppor changed the title [WIP] Add paging support Add paging support Apr 23, 2020
# Conflicts:
#	src/test/java/org/jabref/logic/importer/WebFetchersTest.java
@tobiasdiez
Copy link
Member

@koppor @JoHaHu any update?

@koppor
Copy link
Member Author

koppor commented May 12, 2020

Open point: Add UI

@koppor koppor mentioned this pull request May 12, 2020
3 tasks
@koppor koppor closed this May 12, 2020
@koppor koppor deleted the pagedFetcher branch May 12, 2020 06:48
@koppor koppor restored the pagedFetcher branch November 4, 2020 19:23
@koppor koppor reopened this Nov 4, 2020
@koppor koppor marked this pull request as ready for review November 4, 2020 19:37
@koppor koppor merged commit fcbe9c5 into master Nov 4, 2020
@koppor koppor deleted the pagedFetcher branch November 4, 2020 19:38
@koppor
Copy link
Member Author

koppor commented Nov 4, 2020

Merged, because required as logic module for JabRef#369.

@tobiasdiez
Copy link
Member

Why did you merged this? I thought we don't want to have half-finished code in our code base...

You could have implemented the UI etc easily by PRs against this branch, as we had it for the JavaFX project.

@koppor
Copy link
Member Author

koppor commented Nov 4, 2020

This functionality is required to get @DominikVoigt's implementation finished. As we write, he is working on it. Lean back and prepare for incoming pull requests the next days and weeks.

Regarding the UI for the use case linked at #5518 we still need a volunteer though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants