Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update swingx from 1.6.1 to 1.6.4 #2356

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2016
Merged

Update swingx from 1.6.1 to 1.6.4 #2356

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2016

Conversation

koppor
Copy link
Member

@koppor koppor commented Dec 9, 2016

The changelog of swingx is available there: https://java.net/jira/browse/SWINGX?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:changelog-panel

The only changelog entry with "memory leak" is https://java.net/jira/browse/SWINGX-299. I don't know, wether this is related.

I am aware of #271. Thus, I manually tested which version to use and 1.6.4 seems to be the latest version usable.

We should check whether this helps solving #2247.

  • [n/a] Change in CHANGELOG.md described
  • Tests created for changes
  • [n/a] Screenshots added (for bigger UI changes)
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef
  • [n/a] Check documentation status (Issue created for outdated help page at help.jabref.org?)
  • [n/a] If you changed the localization: Did you run gradle localizationUpdate?

@koppor koppor added the status: ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers label Dec 9, 2016
@lenhard
Copy link
Member

lenhard commented Dec 9, 2016

I tested this and, at least for me, there seems to be no flickering effect. So, I think we should go ahead.

The only long-term solution will be to get rid of swingx. Hopefully, this is possible in the course of JavaFX.

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr merged commit 1789cee into master Dec 9, 2016
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr deleted the updateswingx branch December 9, 2016 13:09
tobiasdiez pushed a commit to tobiasdiez/jabref that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants