Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Export number field as number if not patent or issue in office 07 xml #1931

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 8, 2016

Conversation

Siedlerchr
Copy link
Member

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr commented Sep 7, 2016

Add : Export key field (not to be confused with bibtexkey field),
Add test for custom entry type and key field
Refs #1851

Documentation has to be updated.

  • Change in CHANGELOG.md described
  • Tests created for changes
  • Screenshots added (for bigger UI changes)
  • Manually tested changed features in running JabRef
  • Check documentation status (Issue created for outdated help page at help.jabref.org?)

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
Export key field (not to be confused with bibtexkey field), Add test for custom entry type
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr added the status: ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers label Sep 7, 2016
@Siedlerchr
Copy link
Member Author

Added mapping between note field and comments field.
Now all official fields should be mapped. I will update help accordingly.

@stefan-kolb
Copy link
Member

👍

@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr merged commit cc38019 into master Sep 8, 2016
@Siedlerchr Siedlerchr deleted the office07export branch September 8, 2016 08:25
zesaro pushed a commit to zesaro/jabref that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2016
…JabRef#1931)

* Export number field as number if not patent or issue
Export key field (not to be confused with bibtexkey field), Add test for custom entry type
* Mapping between notes and comments field
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: ready-for-review Pull Requests that are ready to be reviewed by the maintainers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants