-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When assigning a group color to a group, not all entries are marked #7325
Comments
@@ -22797,11 +22797,11 @@ it is less complex than WS-R and well-integrated in the WSPA.},
1 KeywordGroup:SOC\;0\;keywords\;SOC\;0\;0\;1\;\;\;\;;
-1 KeywordGroup:OG\;0\;keywords\;OG\;0\;0\;0\;\;\;\;;
+1 KeywordGroup:OG\;0\;keywords\;OG\;0\;0\;1\;0xccffccff\;\;\;;
1 KeywordGroup:AskedForPDF\;0\;keywords\;AskedForPDF\;1\;0\;1\;\;\;\;; |
@k3KAW8Pnf7mkmdSMPHz27 May I ask whether you could have a look here? |
I have never noticed the name of the dialog window before. My assumption, so far, is that it appears because when you make changes to a group it often implies changes in the bibentries as well. E.g., an explicit group will modify the GROUP field of all entries if you change its name, and the same should happen for all Keyword groups. It is perhaps a little bit misleading and appear in too many cases. I could probably look at this at some point this week. I'd guess the required changes are small.
There are two issues,
|
(Just to state it plainly, I'll look into it after #7173 is merged, it doesn't make sense to do so before) |
This is still open and I am not currently working on it. It ended up spilling needing further down the line changes and I forgot to write about that here, |
In another experiment, only 1/3 of the entries got the group color
Questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: