-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unchecked "Do not ask again" does not work #566
Comments
Hi, can I work on this issue? I'm in a uni group and we've been tasked with contributing to open source software |
A huge discussion was going on at JabRef#9291. Decision: Preferences: Radio-Button-Group for Grobid: enable grobid, disable grobid, always ask for confirmation (source: JabRef#9291 (comment)) (No "DoNotAskAgain" button) Open point: Link to privacy statement. This can be ommitted in the PR. |
Hi everyone ! I want to work on this issue. |
You are working on strings shown to the user. These strings are also localized, because JabRef supports localization. Please read on at https://devdocs.jabref.org/code-howtos/localization.html for that topic. I think, this will help you to resolve the issue. |
The link was helpful. I added the strings to "JabRef_en.properties" and the problem was resolved. |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
I want to confirm that we will omit the "do not ask again" checkbox as mentioned in this comment #566 (comment) @koppor . From a UX perspective, it would be better to keep it. |
Question answered at JabRef#9801 (comment). |
Hi, I would like the work on the issue, please assign it to me if possible! |
Hi, is this issue be worked on? If not, can you please assign this issue to me? I'm a new contributor and learning how to contribute to open source projects. |
@SUPWEZZ This time, you were quicker than @colinldbd, so I assign @SUPWEZZ |
@SUPWEZZ This is a really hard issue, because it is not that much about implementation, but understanding what the current request is. Please go through the discussions, especially JabRef#9801 (comment) Maybe, it would help to create a MADR document for the options to structure the possibilities. |
Hi @koppor, sorry about that I'm a little confused. I just noticed I was being unassigned in two issues, but I would like to request one issue. I would like to ask compare it with "Import by id: cancel doesn't really cancel the request JabRef#10508" and "uncheck Do not ask again" Which issue is more suitable for beginners? |
@SUPWEZZ Both are more harder. For an easy one, I would recommend you to volunteer for JabRef#10569 |
@SUPWEZZ Based on the comment at JabRef#10569 (comment), I assign you here. - Not that I did not an unassignment, you can choose whatever you want. The only condition is that the issue is not already assigned to someone else. Now, please focus on this one. Follow my recommendation at #566 (comment), which I gave you 5 days ago. |
Hello Maintainers, I am a second year CS major who would love to opportunity to take on this issue! I have been able to successfully reproduce the problem, and have also spent time analysing previous work on the topic. |
@arshchawla21 Thank you for choosing this task. I assigned you and I am looking forward to your contribution! |
I suppose this issue was fixed by JabRef#12034? |
metaData.pdf
fromsrc\test\resources\pdfs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: