Ignoring KarafIT until Pax Exam 4.14.0 is released

[whikloj]

GitHub Issue: Islandora/documentation#1443

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ops4j/pJ98QaBVPfE/discussion
https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXEXAM-934

What does this Pull Request do?

Ignores the PaxExam test class.

We need to wait for the 4.14.0 release to re-enable and correct the default maven central address.
Once it is released we can re-enable the test.

How should this be tested?

Empty your maven repository (~/.m2/repository on Mac/Linux)
Build this PR and it passes

Interested parties

@Islandora/8-x-committers - especially @elizoller

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #69 into dev will not change coverage by %.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##                dev      #69   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     89.76%   89.76%           
  Complexity       73       73           
=========================================
  Files            10       10           
  Lines           293      293           
  Branches          1        1           
=========================================
  Hits            263      263           
  Misses           29       29           
  Partials          1        1           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a1dab02...c38cbd5. Read the comment docs.

[elizoller]

I pulled this down and was able to build Alpaca successfully.

[elizoller]

@dannylamb did you want to weigh in on this or should i do an official review?

[dannylamb]

By all means, please merge @elizoller. You don't have to wait for me.

[whikloj]

I'm interested in what an "official review" of an @Ignore annotation looks like 😀

[elizoller]

This works in order to allow Alpaca to build although in my opinion I think it'd be important to open another ticket linked to this pull request so that it isn't lost that updating PaxExam will need to be addressed in the future.