-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
DK Teo
committed
Dec 1, 2020
1 parent
6e662b2
commit 0434d2c
Showing
1 changed file
with
172 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@ | ||
# Copyright (c) Facebook, Inc. and its affiliates. | ||
# | ||
# This source code is licensed under the MIT license found in the | ||
# LICENSE file in the root directory of this source tree. | ||
|
||
import libcst as cst | ||
import libcst.matchers as m | ||
from libcst.helpers import ensure_type | ||
|
||
from fixit.common.base import CstLintRule | ||
from fixit.common.utils import InvalidTestCase as Invalid, ValidTestCase as Valid | ||
|
||
|
||
class UseAssertInRule(CstLintRule): | ||
""" | ||
Discourages use of ``assertTrue(x in y)`` and ``assertFalse(x in y)`` | ||
as it is deprecated (https://docs.python.org/3.8/library/unittest.html#deprecated-aliases). | ||
Use ``assertIn(x, y)`` and ``assertNotIn(x, y)``) instead. | ||
""" | ||
|
||
MESSAGE: str = ( | ||
"Use assertIn/assertNotIn instead of assertTrue/assertFalse for inclusion check.\n" | ||
+ "See https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.html#unittest.TestCase.assertIn)" | ||
) | ||
|
||
VALID = [ | ||
Valid("self.assertIn(a, b)"), | ||
Valid("self.assertIn(f(), b)"), | ||
Valid("self.assertIn(f(x), b)"), | ||
Valid("self.assertIn(f(g(x)), b)"), | ||
Valid("self.assertNotIn(a, b)"), | ||
Valid("self.assertNotIn(f(), b)"), | ||
Valid("self.assertNotIn(f(x), b)"), | ||
Valid("self.assertNotIn(f(g(x)), b)"), | ||
] | ||
|
||
INVALID = [ | ||
Invalid( | ||
"self.assertTrue(a in b)", | ||
expected_replacement="self.assertIn(a, b)", | ||
), | ||
Invalid( | ||
"self.assertTrue(f() in b)", | ||
expected_replacement="self.assertIn(f(), b)", | ||
), | ||
Invalid( | ||
"self.assertTrue(f(x) in b)", | ||
expected_replacement="self.assertIn(f(x), b)", | ||
), | ||
Invalid( | ||
"self.assertTrue(f(g(x)) in b)", | ||
expected_replacement="self.assertIn(f(g(x)), b)", | ||
), | ||
Invalid( | ||
"self.assertTrue(a not in b)", | ||
expected_replacement="self.assertNotIn(a, b)", | ||
), | ||
Invalid( | ||
"self.assertTrue(not a in b)", | ||
expected_replacement="self.assertNotIn(a, b)", | ||
), | ||
Invalid( | ||
"self.assertFalse(a in b)", | ||
expected_replacement="self.assertNotIn(a, b)", | ||
), | ||
] | ||
|
||
def visit_Call(self, node: cst.Call) -> None: | ||
# Todo: Make use of single extract instead of having several | ||
# if else statemenets to make the code more robust and readable. | ||
if m.matches( | ||
node, | ||
m.Call( | ||
func=m.Attribute(value=m.Name("self"), attr=m.Name("assertTrue")), | ||
args=[ | ||
m.Arg( | ||
m.Comparison(comparisons=[m.ComparisonTarget(operator=m.In())]) | ||
) | ||
], | ||
), | ||
): | ||
# self.assertTrue(a in b) -> self.assertIn(a, b) | ||
new_call = node.with_changes( | ||
func=cst.Attribute(value=cst.Name("self"), attr=cst.Name("assertIn")), | ||
args=[ | ||
cst.Arg(ensure_type(node.args[0].value, cst.Comparison).left), | ||
cst.Arg( | ||
ensure_type(node.args[0].value, cst.Comparison) | ||
.comparisons[0] | ||
.comparator | ||
), | ||
], | ||
) | ||
self.report(node, replacement=new_call) | ||
else: | ||
# ... -> self.assertNotIn(a, b) | ||
matched, arg1, arg2 = False, None, None | ||
if m.matches( | ||
node, | ||
m.Call( | ||
func=m.Attribute(value=m.Name("self"), attr=m.Name("assertTrue")), | ||
args=[ | ||
m.Arg( | ||
m.UnaryOperation( | ||
operator=m.Not(), | ||
expression=m.Comparison( | ||
comparisons=[m.ComparisonTarget(operator=m.In())] | ||
), | ||
) | ||
) | ||
], | ||
), | ||
): | ||
# self.assertTrue(not a in b) -> self.assertNotIn(a, b) | ||
matched = True | ||
arg1 = cst.Arg( | ||
ensure_type( | ||
ensure_type(node.args[0].value, cst.UnaryOperation).expression, | ||
cst.Comparison, | ||
).left | ||
) | ||
arg2 = cst.Arg( | ||
ensure_type( | ||
ensure_type(node.args[0].value, cst.UnaryOperation).expression, | ||
cst.Comparison, | ||
) | ||
.comparisons[0] | ||
.comparator | ||
) | ||
elif m.matches( | ||
node, | ||
m.Call( | ||
func=m.Attribute(value=m.Name("self"), attr=m.Name("assertTrue")), | ||
args=[ | ||
m.Arg(m.Comparison(comparisons=[m.ComparisonTarget(m.NotIn())])) | ||
], | ||
), | ||
): | ||
# self.assertTrue(a not in b) -> self.assertNotIn(a, b) | ||
matched = True | ||
arg1 = cst.Arg(ensure_type(node.args[0].value, cst.Comparison).left) | ||
arg2 = cst.Arg( | ||
ensure_type(node.args[0].value, cst.Comparison) | ||
.comparisons[0] | ||
.comparator | ||
) | ||
elif m.matches( | ||
node, | ||
m.Call( | ||
func=m.Attribute(value=m.Name("self"), attr=m.Name("assertFalse")), | ||
args=[ | ||
m.Arg(m.Comparison(comparisons=[m.ComparisonTarget(m.In())])) | ||
], | ||
), | ||
): | ||
# self.assertFalse(a in b) -> self.assertNotIn(a, b) | ||
matched = True | ||
arg1 = cst.Arg(ensure_type(node.args[0].value, cst.Comparison).left) | ||
arg2 = cst.Arg( | ||
ensure_type(node.args[0].value, cst.Comparison) | ||
.comparisons[0] | ||
.comparator | ||
) | ||
|
||
if matched: | ||
new_call = node.with_changes( | ||
func=cst.Attribute( | ||
value=cst.Name("self"), attr=cst.Name("assertNotIn") | ||
), | ||
args=[arg1, arg2], | ||
) | ||
self.report(node, replacement=new_call) |