Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix parquet read speed example #209

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 12, 2025
Merged

Conversation

tomjholland
Copy link
Collaborator

This pull request includes changes to multiple Jupyter notebooks in the docs/source/examples directory. The main goal of these changes is to improve the structure and readability of the notebooks by separating the installation of dependencies into their own code cells.

Improvements to notebook structure:

Additionally, there was a minor change to the file name used in the measure_pyprobe function call in the comparing-pyprobe-performance.ipynb notebook:

@tomjholland tomjholland added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 12, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.85%. Comparing base (2d02893) to head (9a724c7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #209   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.85%   82.85%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        2240     2240           
=======================================
  Hits         1856     1856           
  Misses        384      384           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@tomjholland tomjholland merged commit 5fe8b78 into main Jan 12, 2025
4 checks passed
@tomjholland tomjholland deleted the fix-parquet-read-speed-example branch January 12, 2025 17:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants