Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Use eye transform instead of translation in external_vr" #211

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

svillar
Copy link
Member

@svillar svillar commented Jul 25, 2022

This reverts commit bb776dd.

This was an attempt to fix some distortions we were seeing in some devices.
However it didn't make any difference in the end as the problem was in some
other place. In practice it was changing nothing so we could live with it
but the fact is that it's a barrier for new developers because it forces
devs to build our fork of Gecko to support WebXR sessions (as we were
bumping the version of the protocol used by GeckoView).

This reverts commit bb776dd.

This was an attempt to fix some distortions we were seeing in some devices.
However it didn't make any difference in the end as the problem was in some
other place. In practice it was changing nothing so we could live with it
but the fact is that it's a barrier for new developers because it forces
devs to build our fork of Gecko to support WebXR sessions (as we were
bumping the version of the protocol used by GeckoView).
@svillar
Copy link
Member Author

svillar commented Jul 25, 2022

I think this will remove a barrier for people building Wolvic by themselves like in #210 or #196

@svillar
Copy link
Member Author

svillar commented Jul 25, 2022

BTW note that we'll have to revert also the Gecko patch in our fork

@svillar svillar requested review from elima and felipeerias July 25, 2022 09:45
Copy link
Contributor

@elima elima left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks!

Copy link
Collaborator

@felipeerias felipeerias left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@svillar
Copy link
Member Author

svillar commented Oct 10, 2022

I'm closing this as we are not sure we want to land this

@svillar svillar closed this Oct 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants