✨ web-api: exposes project's icon as an ui attribute

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

This PR introduces project icons. As outlined in #7158, the project icon is managed by the front end and is included in the ui field (credits to @giancarloromeo). This ensures transparency for the backend, which only validates and stores the data. It also simplifies implementation by avoiding the need for an additional database column, unlike services—though services could also potentially use a ui column.

Some details of the implementation

• ✨ web-api allows front-end to
  • create or update an icon in a project via create_project or patch_project
    
• 📝 improves web-api openapi doc and fixes wrong status response for create_project
• ♻️ refactor on projects.ui models
  • these models are part of the schema, not the domain models
  • added more realistic testing examples
  • added fakes
• ♻️ minor cleanup of project model names
  • e.g. ProjectDB -> ProjectDBGet to stress that it is a model that reads from the db

Related issue/s

• closes Projects and service have an icon field #7158

How to test

Driving test: ``

cd services/web/server
make install-dev
pytest -vv tests/unit/**/test_*project*.py
pytest -vv tests/unit/with_dbs/02/test_projects_crud_handlers.py:test_create_get_and_patch_project_ui_field

Dev-ops

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 91.93548% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 87.05%. Comparing base (d432c6c) to head (8709527).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7204      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.06%   87.05%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1646     1646              
  Lines       64297    64312      +15     
  Branches     1186     1186              
==========================================
+ Hits        55977    55990      +13     
- Misses       8008     8010       +2     
  Partials      312      312              

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	65.30% <75.00%> (+1.95%)	⬆️
unittests	86.05% <91.93%> (+0.69%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	76.84% <ø> (ø)
pkg_aws_library	94.02% <ø> (ø)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	97.09% <ø> (ø)
pkg_models_library	91.53% <92.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
pkg_notifications_library	84.57% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.25% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_integration	70.03% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	72.94% <ø> (ø)
pkg_settings_library	90.71% <ø> (ø)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.51% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.46% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.55% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.08% <ø> (ø)
catalog	91.71% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.24% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	93.19% <ø> (ø)
director	76.59% <ø> (-0.10%)	⬇️
director_v2	91.30% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_scheduler	97.17% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	89.78% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	90.25% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.28% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	88.95% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️
storage	86.22% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	84.79% <91.66%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d432c6c...8709527. Read the comment docs.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud