🎨 Services metadata has icon field and API can get/update it 🗃️

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

web

catalog

Any service meta-data now defines an optional icon field to store a url for the service icon. This is exposed to the front-end via the web-api (v0.54.0) under /catalog/services. Note that this is NOT exposed to the public-api so Solver resource does not include an icon.

Details

• 🗃️ new icon column in services_meta_data table
• ♻️ refactors catalog models by using DBGet, DBPath and DBCreate suffixes
• ✨ catalog API schemas (v0.8.0)
  • adds optional icon field to ServiceGetV2``ServiceUpdateV2 schemas
• ✨ webserver API schemas (v0.54.0)
  • adds optional icon field to CatalogServiceGet/CatalogServiceUpdate schemas

Related issue/s

• service part of Projects and service have an icon field #7158

How to test

cd services/web/server
make install-dev
pytest -vv tests/unit/**/test_*catalog*.py

cd services/catalog
make install-dev
make test-dev-unit

Dev-ops

NOne

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.75%. Comparing base (70e88e8) to head (8648086).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7174      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.70%   87.75%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files        1641     1635       -6     
  Lines       64177    64041     -136     
  Branches     1179     1179              
==========================================
- Hits        56286    56201      -85     
+ Misses       7580     7529      -51     
  Partials      311      311              

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.61% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	86.44% <100.00%> (+0.32%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	94.02% <ø> (ø)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	97.09% <ø> (ø)
pkg_models_library	91.51% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
pkg_notifications_library	84.57% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.39% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_integration	70.03% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	74.13% <ø> (ø)
pkg_settings_library	90.71% <ø> (ø)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.50% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.46% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.55% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.08% <ø> (ø)
catalog	91.69% <100.00%> (+0.22%)	⬆️
clusters_keeper	99.24% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	93.19% <ø> (ø)
director	76.92% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	91.29% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	97.17% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	89.75% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	90.25% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.28% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	89.01% <ø> (+0.38%)	⬆️
storage	89.57% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	86.27% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 70e88e8...8648086. Read the comment docs.

[odeimaiz]

Nice, thanks!

[matusdrobuliak66]

👍

[GitHK]

👍

[sanderegg]

great! thanks!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud