♻️ Update traefik router hardcoded priorities

[YuryHrytsuk]

What do these changes do?

• Update traefik router hardcoded priorities according to the rules below
  • 1 --> 3
  • 2 --> 6
  • 3 --> 9
• Remove unnecessary priority from manual service

This PR introduces some space in-between the routers which we can use to flexibly add new routers. It shouldn't break existing priority hierarchy since numbers <10 are still below any other non-hardcoded priorities.

Remarks for future:

• Whenever introducing some priorities to traefik routers (or other similar cases) one better to make them spacious to retain flexibility. This case is a good example why "spacious" approach makes sense

Related issue/s

• unblocks Add fallback nginx to serve "something went wrong" osparc-ops-environments#218

Related PRs

• Update traefik router hardcoded priorities osparc-ops-environments#953
• Add fallback nginx to serve "something went wrong" osparc-ops-environments#950

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.72%. Comparing base (c681035) to head (3527bf0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #7141      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.69%   87.72%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1635     1628       -7     
  Lines       63875    63685     -190     
  Branches     1173     1173              
==========================================
- Hits        56015    55866     -149     
+ Misses       7550     7510      -40     
+ Partials      310      309       -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.66% <ø> (ø)
unittests	86.01% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	94.02% <ø> (ø)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	97.09% <ø> (ø)
pkg_models_library	91.50% <ø> (ø)
pkg_notifications_library	84.57% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.39% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_integration	70.18% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	74.44% <ø> (+0.05%)	⬆️
pkg_settings_library	90.71% <ø> (ø)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.50% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.46% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.55% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.08% <ø> (ø)
catalog	90.33% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.24% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	93.19% <ø> (ø)
director	76.92% <ø> (-0.09%)	⬇️
director_v2	91.27% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
dynamic_scheduler	97.21% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	89.75% <ø> (ø)
efs_guardian	90.25% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.28% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	88.73% <ø> (ø)
storage	89.57% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	86.18% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c681035...3527bf0. Read the comment docs.

[GitHK]

Thanks for the changes

[mrnicegyu11]

makes sense

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[sanderegg]

I guess you know what you are doing ;)