✨ Introduce license item checkout & release functionality (🗃️)

[matusdrobuliak66]

What do these changes do?

• ✨ Introduce license item checkout & release functionality

  • When license item is checkout a checkout ID is returned
  • On the release the checkout ID needs to be provided
  • API server <--> Webserver <--> RUT is wired (Api server needs to be exposed @bisgaard-itis )

• 🗃️♻️ Rename licensed_items_usages --> licensed_items_checkouts with checkout_id

• BONUS:

  • 🐛 Rename text in exception: wallet -> credit account (for frontend)
  • 🐛 Fix export usage CSV
  • 🐛 Improve playwright e2e platform tests

NEXT STEPS:

• Background task to release seats in case of service not running anymore

Related issue/s

• Vendor Specific Resource tracking (VIP service) osparc-issues#1732
• Enable user to lease models from the platform frontend (UI/UX, API) osparc-issues#1799
• Implement backend for time-based leasing of features with seats (Resource tracking) osparc-issues#1800

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 71.34146% with 94 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.58%. Comparing base (f7e3e86) to head (69b0dcd).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6960      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.06%   86.58%   -0.49%     
==========================================
  Files        1611     1556      -55     
  Lines       63632    62162    -1470     
  Branches     2027     1778     -249     
==========================================
- Hits        55400    53820    -1580     
- Misses       7898     8033     +135     
+ Partials      334      309      -25     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.90% <65.71%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
unittests	85.68% <71.34%> (+0.33%)	⬆️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	91.45% <100.00%> (+0.08%)	⬆️
pkg_notifications_library	84.57% <ø> (ø)
pkg_postgres_database	88.26% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg_service_integration	70.02% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	73.29% <0.00%> (-0.85%)	⬇️
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.38% <ø> (ø)
agent	96.82% <ø> (ø)
api_server	90.13% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	96.09% <ø> (ø)
catalog	90.57% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	99.48% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	93.18% <ø> (ø)
director	76.40% <ø> (ø)
director_v2	91.41% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_scheduler	97.14% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	89.75% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
efs_guardian	90.12% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.44% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	∅ <ø> (∅)
payments	92.66% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	88.97% <83.81%> (-0.62%)	⬇️
storage	89.54% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	83.48% <100.00%> (-0.91%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f7e3e86...69b0dcd. Read the comment docs.

[odeimaiz]

merci 👍

[sanderegg]

Thanks!
Just it would be cooler if you have separate PRs with separate concerns. these were a lot of bonuses and it makes more complicated to understand separate things.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud