⬆️♻️ WIP: Fixes openapi generators for web-api, i.e. api/specs/web-server

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

• Fixes openapi generators for web-api, i.e. api/specs/web-server
  • "_catalog", < ---- FIXME: Invalid args for response field! Hint: check that <class 'models_library.api_schemas_webserver.catalog.ServiceResourcesGet'> is a valid Pydantic field type
  • "_cluster" <--- FIXME: :TypeError: unhashable type: 'ClusterAccessRights'
  • "_publications" <--- FIXME: RuntimeWarning: fields may not start with an underscore, ignoring "_file"
  • How to modify schema in class Json for pydantic v2?
    

Related issue/s

• Part of Major upgrade to pydantic 2.0 #4481

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.83%. Comparing base (c38b064) to head (821604b).
Report is 13 commits behind head on pydantic_v2_migration_do_not_squash_updates.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                               Coverage Diff                               @@
##           pydantic_v2_migration_do_not_squash_updates    #6771      +/-   ##
===============================================================================
- Coverage                                        88.40%   84.83%   -3.58%     
===============================================================================
  Files                                             1545     1254     -291     
  Lines                                            61635    53145    -8490     
  Branches                                          2100      885    -1215     
===============================================================================
- Hits                                             54490    45084    -9406     
- Misses                                            6817     7926    +1109     
+ Partials                                           328      135     -193     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.78% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	83.07% <100.00%> (-4.01%)	⬇️

Components	Coverage Δ
api	79.60% <ø> (ø)
pkg_aws_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_dask_task_models_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_models_library	91.23% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
pkg_notifications_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_postgres_database	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_service_integration	70.00% <ø> (ø)
pkg_service_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_settings_library	∅ <ø> (∅)
pkg_simcore_sdk	85.36% <ø> (ø)
agent	97.00% <ø> (ø)
api_server	89.72% <ø> (ø)
autoscaling	95.21% <ø> (ø)
catalog	90.57% <ø> (ø)
clusters_keeper	98.73% <ø> (ø)
dask_sidecar	91.26% <ø> (ø)
datcore_adapter	93.17% <ø> (ø)
director	75.97% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
director_v2	91.15% <ø> (+0.09%)	⬆️
dynamic_scheduler	96.59% <ø> (ø)
dynamic_sidecar	89.75% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
efs_guardian	90.12% <ø> (ø)
invitations	93.44% <ø> (ø)
osparc_gateway_server	85.49% <ø> (ø)
payments	92.76% <ø> (ø)
resource_usage_tracker	90.64% <ø> (-0.15%)	⬇️
storage	89.66% <ø> (ø)
webclient	∅ <ø> (∅)
webserver	75.32% <ø> (-13.38%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c38b064...821604b. Read the comment docs.

---- 🚨 Try these New Features:

• JS Bundle Analysis - Avoid shipping oversized bundles

[sanderegg]

not completely sure I understand what you are trying to do here. especially the Jsonstr and the comments in openapi.py

[pcrespov]

not completely sure I understand what you are trying to do here. especially the Jsonstr and the comments in openapi.py
@sanderegg this is still draft

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[matusdrobuliak66]

Thanks, you need to explain me which of these changes fixed the open api specs for folder ID from int -> int | none

[pcrespov]

After merging #6578 into master we follow up this in #6787