🎨 add running_time_in_hours to /services/-/aggregated-usages

[matusdrobuliak66]

What do these changes do?

• 🎨 add running_time_in_hours to /services/-/aggregated-usages

Related issue/s

• closes Backend: Add aggregated time in the credits summary view osparc-issues#1671
• relates UX of credits burning osparc-issues#1409
• relates Show time spent on a service in the Credits Summary view osparc-issues#1622

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.8%. Comparing base (cafbf96) to head (8613140).
Report is 530 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #6350      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage    84.5%   88.8%    +4.2%     
=========================================
  Files          10    1218    +1208     
  Lines         214   53684   +53470     
  Branches       25     865     +840     
=========================================
+ Hits          181   47699   +47518     
- Misses         23    5854    +5831     
- Partials       10     131     +121     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.6% <ø> (?)
unittests	86.5% <100.0%> (+1.9%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...api_schemas_resource_usage_tracker/service_runs.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...ge_tracker/models/resource_tracker_service_runs.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...racker/modules/db/repositories/resource_tracker.py	75.7% <ø> (ø)
..._tracker/services/resource_tracker_service_runs.py	100.0% <ø> (ø)

... and 1201 files with indirect coverage changes

[odeimaiz]

Thanks!

[sanderegg]

thanks