-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2 | 1.2.2 | Define use cases for DDI-CDI support | 5 #6
Comments
This issue represents a deliverable funded by the NIH Aim 2: Increase support for biomedical and cross-domain metadata standards and controlled vocabularies One of the useful characteristics of the Dataverse open-source software is its extensive support for metadata standards and additional custom metadata. The standards currently supported include:
In particular, DDI makes a Dataverse repository interoperable even at the variable/attribute level since it supports variable descriptive and statistical metadata. This allows data exploration and analysis tools to integrate easily with the repository and discovery engines to find variable information. In this project, we propose to
Other deliverables associated with this one: |
In talking with Jim, he pointed out that the current list of issues that we collected around this do not address:
This may be more about tracking provenance of the data as it travels through time. |
Who:
Comment - we have to start from the very beginning on this one. |
Replaced this description today The deliverables are:
2 | 1.2.1 | Design and implement integration with controlled vocabularies | 5#9027 2 | 2.2.1 | Design and implement support for DDI-CDI ┆Issue is synchronized with this Smartsheet row by Unito |
. |
Eliminating the sidecar issue: Notes all pasted here.We had an initial meeting oct 20th and identified possible solutions for the deliverable. Next step:
In subsequent conversations it's already been discussed that this deliverable appears to be of lower cost/benefit for our users than some of the other deliverablesThis is a map to a summary of the points that came out of the meeting. The possible steps that came out of the meeting were:
|
Last Updated: Mon Dec 5 2022 (1.2.2) Resources have been identified to review the DDI-CDI specification and identified two use cases which allows Dataverse to accept, store, and export the format without interpret it and export to exisiting dataset metaset in this format. 12% |
Last updated: Thu Dec 15 2022 before I left for the holiday. No changes. Resources have been identified to review the DDI-CDI specification and identified two use cases which allows Dataverse to accept, store, and export the format without interpreting it and export to existing dataset metaset in this format. |
priority discussion with Stefano;
|
January update (1.2.2) Two use cases which allows Dataverse to accept, store, and export the format without interpreting it and export to existing dataset metaset in this format. In a holding pattern on this pending more activity from the community on the definition. |
February monthly update (1.2.2) Two use cases which allows Dataverse to accept, store, and export |
March Update (1.2.2) This activity was completed at an extent of 20% in year 1 and transferred to year 2 |
Draft year 1 summary: FY1 Annual Summary This activity was completed at an extent of 20% in year 1. This year we examined two use cases. The first would allow Dataverse to accept, store, and export the format without interpreting it. The second would allow the export of an existing dataset in the DDI-CDI format. Work paused here pending more activity from the community on the DDI-CDI definition. Year 2 work toward completion will be tracked as yr:2 aim:2 task:2a (2.2.2A) starting at 20% complete. |
References:
Problem Statement
The DDI-CDI standard is still new. We are not aware of any use of it. That said, our last datapoint was in 2021. We need to determine what has already been done in this space and identify what use cases for the standard we might be able to implement that will move the standard forward.
Proposed Solution
We identified 2 use cases. First we can allow Dataverse to accept, store, and export the format without interpreting it. We can also enable Dataverse to export an existing dataset metadata in this format.
We also need to acknowledge that we are not very familiar with this standard and so doing some exploratory research which we can summarize and share in a paper will be helpful to us and likely helpful to others.
Acceptance Criteria
Links:
Last updated: Thu Dec 15 2022 before I left for the holiday. No changes.
Report: Dec 2022
Resources have been identified to review the DDI-CDI specification and identified two use cases which allows Dataverse to accept, store, and export the format without interpreting it and export to existing dataset metaset in this format.
12%
┆Issue is synchronized with this Smartsheet row by Unito
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: