Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: faster test execution #1552

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 22, 2017
Merged

test: faster test execution #1552

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 22, 2017

Conversation

monperrus
Copy link
Collaborator

because no need to build the model for the whole src/main/java for certain tests

@spoon-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Revapi Analysis results

Old API: fr.inria.gforge.spoon:spoon-core:jar:6.0.0-20170921.182338-36

New API: fr.inria.gforge.spoon:spoon-core:jar:6.0.0-SNAPSHOT

Detected changes: 1.

Change 1

Name Element
Old class spoon.reflect.visitor.ListPrinter
New class spoon.reflect.visitor.ListPrinter
Code java.class.nonPublicPartOfAPI
Description Class 'spoon.reflect.visitor.ListPrinter' is indirectly included in the API (by the means of method return type for example) but the class is not accessible (neither public nor protected).
Breaking binary: non_breaking

@spoon-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Revapi Analysis results

Old API: fr.inria.gforge.spoon:spoon-core:jar:6.0.0-20170921.182338-36

New API: fr.inria.gforge.spoon:spoon-core:jar:6.0.0-SNAPSHOT

Detected changes: 1.

Change 1

Name Element
Old class spoon.reflect.visitor.ListPrinter
New class spoon.reflect.visitor.ListPrinter
Code java.class.nonPublicPartOfAPI
Description Class 'spoon.reflect.visitor.ListPrinter' is indirectly included in the API (by the means of method return type for example) but the class is not accessible (neither public nor protected).
Breaking binary: non_breaking,

@surli surli merged commit 8c6ab05 into INRIA:master Sep 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants