You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the ill-conditioned case, different parameter vectors are used than in the initial attempt. They don't include the most recent parameters. This seems wrong to me, but maybe somebody knows better.
EDIT: Well, actually both cases seem to be wrong. Both use only reg_points - 1 points instead of the presumably intended reg_points. In the first case, the oldest one is omitted, in the second case the most recent one is omitted.
…_polynomial`
There seems to be an indexing error in `pypesto.profile.profile_next_guess.get_reg_polynomial`, resulting in too few points being used for extrapolating parameter trajectories.
In the second case, not only too few, but also not the most recent parameter values are used.
ClosesICB-DCM#1224
Hi, can somebody comment on whether the following code makes sense?
This is polynomial regression to extrapolate parameter values for parameter profiles in the adaptive stepsize case.
pyPESTO/pypesto/profile/profile_next_guess.py
Lines 355 to 372 in 223859e
In the ill-conditioned case, different parameter vectors are used than in the initial attempt. They don't include the most recent parameters. This seems wrong to me, but maybe somebody knows better.
EDIT: Well, actually both cases seem to be wrong. Both use only
reg_points - 1
points instead of the presumably intendedreg_points
. In the first case, the oldest one is omitted, in the second case the most recent one is omitted.What I think it should look like: #1226
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: