Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[ACT:afw4f7] Background color calculation issue when the background contains text-shadow #1203

Closed
shunguoy opened this issue Dec 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

[ACT:afw4f7] Background color calculation issue when the background contains text-shadow #1203

shunguoy opened this issue Dec 15, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
@shunguoy
Labels
ACT Issues/Rules related to ACT engine Issues in the accessibility-checker-engine component priority-2 (med) Ready for QA

Comments

@shunguoy
Copy link
Contributor

When the background contains text-shadow, the background color cannot be calculated.

see pass example 4 ACT afw4f7.
@shunguoy shunguoy added the engine Issues in the accessibility-checker-engine component label Dec 15, 2022
@shunguoy shunguoy changed the title Background color calculation issue when the background contains text-shadow [ACT] Background color calculation issue when the background contains text-shadow Jan 12, 2023
@philljenkins philljenkins added the ACT Issues/Rules related to ACT label Jan 25, 2023
@tombrunet tombrunet changed the title [ACT] Background color calculation issue when the background contains text-shadow [ACT:afw4f7] Background color calculation issue when the background contains text-shadow Feb 10, 2023
@shunguoy shunguoy mentioned this issue Apr 19, 2023
Merged
1 task
@ErickRenteria
Copy link
Contributor

Validated

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@shunguoy shunguoy

Labels
ACT Issues/Rules related to ACT engine Issues in the accessibility-checker-engine component priority-2 (med) Ready for QA
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@aliunwala @philljenkins @shunguoy @ErickRenteria @drjoho