Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Package Humanizer.Core.fil-PH 2.9.7 is not compatible with net5.0 (.NETCoreApp,Version=v5.0). Package Humanizer.Core.fil-PH 2.9.7 does not support any target frameworks. #1057

Open
mawendel opened this issue Apr 27, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Package Humanizer.Core.fil-PH 2.9.7 is not compatible with net5.0 (.NETCoreApp,Version=v5.0). Package Humanizer.Core.fil-PH 2.9.7 does not support any target frameworks. #1057

mawendel opened this issue Apr 27, 2021 · 5 comments
Labels
bug external

Comments

@mawendel
Copy link

While trying to upgrade from version 2.8.26 to 2.9.7 i receive the following error message:

Package Humanizer.Core.fil-PH 2.9.7 is not compatible with net5.0 (.NETCoreApp,Version=v5.0). Package Humanizer.Core.fil-PH 2.9.7 does not support any target frameworks.
@clairernovotny
Copy link
Member

I can repro and am looking into it with the NuGet team. The locale appears valid: https://www.localeplanet.com/compare/fil-PH/index.html and I don't see any obvious errors with the resource package.

@clairernovotny clairernovotny mentioned this issue Apr 27, 2021
Closed
@clairernovotny
Copy link
Member

I released 2.9.9 that doesn't include fil-PH by default until NuGet fixes their issue.

@ErikEJ
Copy link

ErikEJ commented Apr 29, 2021

Link to NuGet issue?

@clairernovotny
Copy link
Member

@JonDouglas did you create an issue for this yet?

@JonDouglas
Copy link

NuGet/Home#10805

@clairernovotny clairernovotny mentioned this issue Nov 4, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug external
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@JonDouglas @clairernovotny @ErikEJ @mawendel