erlang_ls 0.51.0 (new formula)

[nikitaservais]

• Have you followed the guidelines for contributing?
• Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same formula update/change?
• Have you built your formula locally with HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Is your test running fine brew test <formula>, where <formula> is the name of the formula you're submitting?
• Does your build pass brew audit --strict <formula> (after doing HOMEBREW_NO_INSTALL_FROM_API=1 brew install --build-from-source <formula>)? If this is a new formula, does it pass brew audit --new <formula>?

---

[github-actions]

Thanks for contributing to Homebrew! 🎉 It looks like you're having trouble with a CI failure. See our contribution guide for help. You may be most interested in the section on dealing with CI failures. You can find the CI logs in the Checks tab of your pull request.

[nikitaservais]

Hello, I am sorry, but I do not understand the failed test CI / macOS 14-arm64 (pull_request). It seems to be installing the formula without the dependency, but escript is needed for the installation, and it is in the dependency erlang. Could you give me feedback?

Edit: I tested in local on M1 Pro

[SMillerDev]

You defined the dependency as build-only so it's uninstalling it for runtime testing. I guess you need to add a depends_on "escript"

[chenrui333]

@nikitaservais, thanks for your first contribution to homebrew-core!! 🎉 🥇

Without awesome contributors like you, it would be impossible to maintain Homebrew to the high level of quality users have come to expect. Thank you!!!!

[github-actions]

@chenrui333 has requested bottles to be published to this PR.