Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

#468 Patterns in "fun" rules should accept unscoped variables #605

Merged

Conversation

imaqtkatt
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@imaqtkatt imaqtkatt requested a review from developedby June 25, 2024 20:50
@imaqtkatt imaqtkatt self-assigned this Jun 25, 2024
@imaqtkatt imaqtkatt linked an issue Jun 25, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link
Member

@developedby developedby left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add a test that uses an unscoped in this position?

@developedby developedby added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8440fad Jun 26, 2024
5 checks passed
@imaqtkatt imaqtkatt deleted the 468-patterns-in-fun-rules-shouldnt-accept-unscoped-variables branch June 26, 2024 11:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Patterns in "fun" rules shouldn't accept unscoped variables
2 participants