Use OWL API Turtle Serialization #91
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi Jan Martin, thanx. However, I'm not sure: we have some redundancies now: the new dct:rights tag duplicates the information from dc:date, dc:creator and dct:license. And in the past, we had the license text in full (now the commented-out dc:license tag), but it has been changed into a ref to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ as that was deemed better. For that reason, I included the text as a comment because I wanted it to be human readable.
So, I'm not really sure what to do now. It needs some discussion and/or consideration. Is that Ok?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey Jan Martin, this deletes the original om-2.0.rdf if I understand correctly. We can't do that, please see the discussion we have in issue #80. The ttl version may be derived from the original rdf source, but not replace it. For instance, the original order has gone in the ttl file.
Hope you don't mind my comment. Or do I perhaps misunderstand something?
|
Closed due to decision on #80. |
This PR is an proposal solution for #80. It moves the rights statement from the XML comment into an ontology annotation and then converts the custom RDF/XML serialization into the OWL API serialization.