Narrow home page

[catalinred]

This fixes #574

• Please note that all the .html changes are due to wrapping the content into .container.
  This is related to removing the .container wrapper from base.html as the index is based on a CSS grid structure.
• Enhanced the contributors block on wide displays as well.
• Organized a bit the MQ's from index.css and removed some redundant lines

[tunetheweb]

I think this looks a LOT better!

However spotted one issue on mobile and want to discuss the container change more.

[catalinred]

Not strictly related to this PR, but I've noticed two things:

• the /table-of-contents and /contributors are adding extra 10px sides padding, I think this is extra, unless this is not intended perhaps for the ebook pages?

• On the /2019/ page, for the sake of readability and UX, would love to see the intro phrase split into multiple paragraphs, as in /2020/ perhaps, what do you think? Same for the Featured Chapter text as well.

[tunetheweb]

• the /table-of-contents and /contributors are adding extra 10px sides padding, I think this is extra, unless this is not intended perhaps for the ebook pages?

The ebook reimplements the contents for those two pieces in base/2019/base_ebook.html so doesn’t use those two templates at all. So guessing extra?

• On the /2019/ page, for the sake of readability and UX, would love to see the intro phrase split into multiple paragraphs, as in /2020/ perhaps, what do you think? Same for the Featured Chapter text as well.`

Yeah I could go with that. Though then need to look at all languages. Maybe better as a separate follow up PR after we merge this one? And btw still disagree with @rviscom’s decision to put 2020 temporary text in italics 😀

Leave featured chapter alone btw as lots going on for that in other branches/PRs.

[catalinred]

So guessing extra?

I did remove the extra CSS lines.

better as a separate follow up PR

Sure thing.

[tunetheweb]

Nice bit of clean up @catalinred - well done!

@rviscomi let me know if you want to review too or happy for me to merge?

[rviscomi]

Go ahead and merge. Thanks @catalinred!