-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 183
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Privacy 2020 #913
Comments
Great (and very relevant!) topic. Should it be merged with Cookies though as often quite related? Or do we think there's enough for them both to be their own chapter? |
@bazzadp Good q. I think this is something that will be made clear as we brainstorm what metrics should belong in this chapter. If there ends up being a lot of overlap and not enough unique to this chapter alone... then we can talk about merging it with another chapter like Cookies That's what we're doing with some other chapters like JAMstack |
I think I could contribute as a reviewer on this topic. |
I nominate @johnwilander (see #876 ) |
I would like to volunteer as an analyst/author. |
Thanks @ydimova! I'll put you down as an analyst. Would you also mind sharing some of your qualifications/experience with web privacy? I'm not able to find much info from a cursory search, as your full name is not associated with your GitHub profile. Just want to check before assigning the chapter to you :) @johnwilander are you interested in coauthoring this chapter? |
@rviscomi Of course! I'm a computer scientist and PhD student in web privacy and security (no publications yet). I have been using the httparchive dataset for some of my research so I think I could contribute as an analyst and coauthor. |
Thanks @ydimova, you sound like a great fit for this chapter! I've added you as an author. Can I also put you down as the content team lead? You'd be the point person for keeping the chapter on schedule. You're also free to add people as coauthors/reviewers as needed. A few resources to get you started:
I've also added @ldevernay as a reviewer. @johnwilander we'd still love to have you contribute as a coauthor/reviewer. Let us know! |
@rviscomi Sure, thanks! |
Hey @ydimova, just wanted to check in and see if there's anything you need from me to keep things moving forward. We're tying to have the outline and metrics settled on by the end of the week so we have time to configure the Web Crawler to track everything you need :) Also, can you remind your team to properly add and credit themselves in your chapter's Google Doc? |
Unfortunately we've had to close the Cookie chapter, but think it's heavily related to Privacy anyway so that's another interesting angle to cover in this chapter if you want! |
Migrating to this one from Cookie chapter as an analyst ;) |
@ydimova How is the outline coming along? We want to have that wrapped up by the end of the week so we have time to set up our Web Crawler :) |
@ydimova Also don't forget to join the |
@ydimova - As cookies chapter got closed, this may be of interest to this group - https://github.com/AliasIO/wappalyzer/issues/3219 It will be good to report on % of sites using cookie consent management solutions (obviously within EU, we will see higher %) and out of sites using cookie consent management solutions, how many are using explicit Vs implicit consent? Because of the way, HTTPArchive works, any sites with explicit consent will have less number of third parties reported and that can also impact Third Party chapter of Web Almanac. I am not sure if you are thinking in that direction OR any analysis has been done before. |
@rockeynebhwani I think it would indeed be interesting to measure the percentage of websites using popular and less popular cookie consent managament platforms and IAB Europe's TCF (if feasible). @max-ostapenko @ldevernay Could you join the outline document :) |
@ydimova I've sent you an invite to join the 2020 Authors team, which we'll use to communicate to authors about upcoming milestones. Could you visit https://github.com/HTTPArchive to accept the invitation? I want to make sure you're included in our messages :) |
@ydimova @bazzadp @rviscomi - Created a PR for Wappalyzer - https://github.com/AliasIO/wappalyzer/pull/3227. This team can add more technology vendors to the list on top of this. |
@ydimova @max-ostapenko Noticed there are a few metrics you might need custom metrics written for (e.g., finding policy links on a webpage). Can you make a list of what custom metrics you need by EOD tomorrow? |
@ydimova - I have done the PR and now Wappalyzer has a new category called 'Cookie Compliance' and for now I managed to add 17 vendors to this category. But while working on this, I realized that there are way too many vendors in this space and I don't have time to add all. I am not familier with IAB Europe's TCF solution but if you can tell me a pattern using which we can detect and a sample site, I think we still have time to add to my PR. |
@rockeynebhwani Great, thank you! Maybe we could just stick to the biggest vendors? |
Thanks @ydimova . Can you please give me an example site to test TCF framework? |
@rockeynebhwani FYI here are official framework docs from IAB: https://iabeurope.eu/tcf-2-0/ |
@rockeynebhwani @max-ostapenko I found it on https://www.letudiant.fr/ by calling "window.__cmp" (without the brackets). https://www.senscritique.com/ is another one |
@ydimova @max-ostapenko for the two milestones overdue on July 27 could you check the boxes if:
Keeping the milestone checklist up to date helps us to see at a glance how all of the chapters are progressing. Thanks for helping us to stay on schedule! |
I've updated the chapter metadata at the top of this issue to link to the public spreadsheet that will be used for this chapter's query results. The sheet serves 3 purposes:
|
@ydimova in case you missed it, we've adjusted the milestones to push the launch date back from November 9 to December 9. This gives all chapters exactly 7 weeks from now to wrap up the analysis, write a draft, get it reviewed, and submit it for publication. So the next milestone will be to complete the first draft by November 12. However if you're still on schedule to be done by the original November 9 launch date we want you to know that this change doesn't mean your hard work was wasted, and that you'll get the privilege of being part of our "Early Access" launch. Please see the link above for more info and reach out to @rviscomi or me if you have any questions or concerns about the timeline. We hope this change gives you a bit more breathing room to finish the chapter comfortably and we're excited to see it go live! |
@ydimova FYI There is a cookie parameters data in Security chapter, in case you wanted to share some insights. |
Part II Chapter 10: Privacy
Content team
Content team lead: @ydimova
Welcome chapter contributors! You'll be using this issue throughout the chapter lifecycle to coordinate on the content planning, analysis, and writing stages.
The content team is made up of the following contributors:
New contributors: If you're interested in joining the content team for this chapter, just leave a comment below and the content team lead will loop you in.
Note: To ensure that you get notifications when tagged, you must be "watching" this repository.
Milestones
0. Form the content team
1. Plan content
2. Gather data
3. Validate results
4. Draft content
5. Publication
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: