-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong emission of st_align(4)_u8 HSAIL insn #4
Comments
This is an illegal instruction: st_align(4)_u8 9, 0, 0, 0, [$d0+8]; st takes only two arguments, this has somehow pushed in 5. HSAILasm can disassemble the BRIG, but cannot assemble it again:
I wonder how can it work for some other platform. Using the standard struct parsing, I cannot get access to the 9 byte in that list. |
Ok, I will fix that in HSA back-end, however can you please paste here a link to an issue you did for HSAILAsm? Thanks |
I didn't because I wasn't sure if this is a HSAILasm bug after all. It should complain in case trying to disassemble an illegal BRIG such as this? It complains when it tries to assembly it. |
I think so, because they do it in different situations where an assembled BRIG is invalid. Martin |
When -fcf-protection -mcet is used, I got FAIL: g++.dg/eh/sighandle.C (gdb) bt #0 _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=exc@entry=0x416ed0) at /export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/libgcc/unwind.inc:140 #1 0x00007ffff7d9936b in __cxxabiv1::__cxa_throw (obj=<optimized out>, tinfo=0x403dd0 <typeinfo for int@@CXXABI_1.3>, dest=0x0) at /export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_throw.cc:90 #2 0x0000000000401255 in sighandler (signo=11, si=0x7fffffffd6f8, uc=0x7fffffffd5c0) at /export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/sighandle.C:9 #3 <signal handler called> <<<< Signal frame which isn't on shadow stack #4 dosegv () at /export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/sighandle.C:14 #5 0x00000000004012e3 in main () at /export/gnu/import/git/sources/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/sighandle.C:30 (gdb) p frames $6 = 5 (gdb) frame count should be 4, not 5. This patch skips signal frames when unwinding shadow stack. gcc/testsuite/ PR libgcc/85334 * g++.dg/torture/pr85334.C: New test. libgcc/ PR libgcc/85334 * unwind-generic.h (_Unwind_Frames_Increment): New. * config/i386/shadow-stack-unwind.h (_Unwind_Frames_Increment): Likewise. * unwind.inc (_Unwind_RaiseException_Phase2): Increment frame count with _Unwind_Frames_Increment. (_Unwind_ForcedUnwind_Phase2): Likewise. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@259502 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Running following snippet with GCC HSA BE:
http://pastebin.com/x93CvJDM
Produces:
prog kernel &main__omp_fn_0(kernarg_u64 %_omp_data_i)
{
ld_kernarg_align(8)_u64 $d0, [%_omp_data_i];
@BB_3045_2:
ld_align(8)_u64 $d0, [$d0];
st_align(4)_u8 9, 0, 0, 0, [$d0+8];
ret;
};
While running gccbrig I see following wrong store of zero value (instead of 9):
__wi_loop_x:
d0_28 = MEM[(unsigned long *)__args_27(D)];
_29 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<unsigned char *>(d0_28);
d0_30 = MEM[(unsigned long *)_29];
_31 = d0_30 + 8;
_32 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<unsigned char *>(_31);
*_32 = 0;
__local_x_34 = __local_x_1 + 1;
if (__cur_wg_size_x_11 > __local_x_34)
goto <bb 5> (__wi_loop_x);
else
goto <bb 6>;
Thanks,
Martin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: