-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 265
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify vlen string message documentation #3950
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To me, "base type" seems more appropriate since a variable-length type is similar to a container around some other type. That is to say, it seems to me to be more appropriate to call the variable-length type the parent type and the more fundamental type should be referred to as the base type.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The documentation generally seems to use 'base type' and 'parent type' interchangeably. Enums and arrays are also described as having 'parent types' - would it be best to standardize all of these cases to refer to 'base types'? The field in the shared datatype structure is named
parent
, but that may not matter since it's internal.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I definitely think it would be good to standardize on a term, whether that's 'base type' or 'parent type'. The library definitely uses the two interchangeably fairly often, but I've personally always found 'parent type' to be confusing when used to refer to the type that a container type (vlen, array, compound) contains. The header comment for
H5Tvlen_create
even says "Create a new variable-length datatype based on the specified BASE_TYPE." and the parameter isbase_id
.@derobins @fortnern Any opinions on this?