-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 578
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix make install #1122
Fix make install #1122
Conversation
hum make install is more an "example" on how to install on /usr/local, how could it use On my ubuntu 17.04 (python 3.5) and 17.10 (python 3.6),
Why is it better to use site-packages? |
I'm packaging guake for archlinux with The output of
shows that dist-packages is not created.
|
|
ok. apparently this is a debian specificity: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9387928/whats-the-difference-between-dist-packages-and-site-packages can you add an top level option such as:
the best would be to find a way to retrieve it from pip. Somes did use something like
to get it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
unfortunately pip and easy_install does not install here on debian/ubuntu, so the settings files cannot be compiled here
Does this work for you? |
looks good :) |
Fix make install.
Shouldn't it be site-packages and not dist-packages?
Should I run
make reno SLUG=<short_name_of_my_feature>
for this?