Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Parlllel Control Hatch works abnormally #19

Closed
Mobius0526 opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

[BUG] Parlllel Control Hatch works abnormally #19

Mobius0526 opened this issue Aug 9, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@Mobius0526
Copy link

for example:
Iron ore → Crushed iron ore 2eu/t 20s
The number of parallels is set to 1 → 2eu/t 20s
The number of parallels is set to 2 → 6eu/t 20s
The number of parallels is set to 3 → 8eu/t 20s
The number of parallels is set to 128(use LV Energy Hatch) → 66eu/t 20s The intelligent parllel control hatch thinks that 64 / 2 = 32, so it uses 32 parallelism, but it does not know that it consumes an extra energy

@PrototypeTrousers
Copy link
Contributor

will be fixed by GregTechCEu/GregTech/pull/1120
The extra energy consumption is not intended.

@xeals
Copy link

xeals commented Jan 15, 2023

I'm still observing this behaviour on v1.1.6 of GCYM and v2.5.0 of GTCEu.

Large (Thermal) Centrifuge Unit processing any crushed ore (20s @ 30EU/t) with 1 MV energy hatch (256EU/t limit):

  • 1x parallel: 10s @ 120EU/t (1 overclock)
  • 2x parallel: 20s @ 90EU/t (no overclock); expecting 10s @ 240EU/t
  • 3x parallel: 20s @ 120EU/t (no overclock)

In each case above 1 parallel modifier there's an extra recipe's worth in power being added.

@Mobius0526
Copy link
Author

I'm still observing this behaviour on v1.1.6 of GCYM and v2.5.0 of GTCEu.

Large (Thermal) Centrifuge Unit processing any crushed ore (20s @ 30EU/t) with 1 MV energy hatch (256EU/t limit):

  • 1x parallel: 10s @ 120EU/t (1 overclock)
  • 2x parallel: 20s @ 90EU/t (no overclock); expecting 10s @ 240EU/t
  • 3x parallel: 20s @ 120EU/t (no overclock)

In each case above 1 parallel modifier there's an extra recipe's worth in power being added.

This issue has been closed. Your submission error may not be found

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants