🎯 2023-09-19 Carbon Aware SDK Weekly Meeting Agenda

[Willmish]

Date

2023-09-19 - 8am UTC

Meeting notices

Antitrust Policy

Linux Foundation meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.

Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation meetings and in connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust Policy available at http://www.linuxfoundation.org/antitrust-policy. If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.

Recordings

GSF project meetings may be recorded for use solely by the GSF team for administration purposes. In very limited instances, and with explicit approval, recordings may be made more widely available.

Roll Call

Please add a comment to this issue during the meeting to denote attendance.

Full Name	Affiliation	GitHub username (optional)
Vaughan Knight	Microsoft	vaughanknight

Any untracked attendees will be added by the GSF team below

Agenda

• Convene & Roll Call (5mins)
• Review Meeting Notices (see above)
• Review the agenda and suggest new agenda points
• Approve Past Meeting Minutes
• Review Pull Requests
  • EMFree data source should regard specified time range #389
  • Fix: verify-azure-function-with-packages #383 #393
  • Add Helm chart and workflow #381
• Discuss Issues
  • Issues marked for discussion: https://github.com/Green-Software-Foundation/carbon-aware-sdk/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3A%22for+discussion%22

PRs

Issues

Discussion

• [ ]

Action Items

• @vaughanknight , about Add Helm chart and workflow #381, as per comments in the PR, do we (1) need to edit ADR, (2) do not need to edit the ADR, (3) edit the ADR separately ? Assuming (30 separate for now if we need to, but please confirm cc @YaSuenag
• @Willmish to review EMFree data source should regard specified time range #389
• @Willmish to fix [Bug]: container_azure_function job in GHA failed #383 (issue seems to be about removing dangling images when there are none which needs to be avoided)
• @danuw to progress [Bug]: Fix and update doc deployment workflow #344 following latest feedback
• next meeting: check status of Added JsonForecast datasource #312

Meeting attended by

[danuw]

Attended

[Willmish]

Attended

[YaSuenag]

Attended

[nttDamien]

Attended

[Willmish]

Discussion points:

• When requesting from emisions endpoints "e.g. /emissions/bylocation", should we throw an ArgumentOutOfRangeException exception when the dateRange is for example requesting a future date.
  @Willmish concern - we need to make assumptions about underlying data sources that they will not accept the date ranges.
• @YaSuenag to create an issue on the above mentioned topic