Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix regression from port forwarding #1616

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2019

Conversation

priyawadhwa
Copy link
Contributor

I introduced this regression when adding "pod name" to they port forward
entry key -- whenever a pod was replaced, it's name would change and it
would be mapped to a new port.

This should fix that issue, but I initally introduced "pod name" so that
replicated pods would map to different ports. I'll work on finding a
solution for that in another PR.

Fix #1594

I introduced this regression when adding "pod name" to they port forward
entry key -- whenever a pod was replaced, it's name would change and it
would be mapped to a new port.

This should fix that issue, but I initally introduced "pod name" so that
replicated pods would map to different ports. I'll work on finding a
solution for that in another PR.
@priyawadhwa priyawadhwa changed the title Remove regression from port forwarding Fix regression from port forwarding Feb 6, 2019
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 6, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1616 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1616   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   47.01%   47.01%           
=======================================
  Files         117      117           
  Lines        5118     5118           
=======================================
  Hits         2406     2406           
  Misses       2471     2471           
  Partials      241      241
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pkg/skaffold/kubernetes/port_forward.go 42.27% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 08d5615...300dac0. Read the comment docs.

@dgageot dgageot merged commit ec42e37 into GoogleContainerTools:master Feb 6, 2019
@priyawadhwa priyawadhwa deleted the pfbug branch February 6, 2019 21:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

port-forwarding in skaffold dev is basically broken
4 participants