Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verifies the contents of configuration.md against the default serialized configuration #4017

Closed
asbjornu opened this issue May 6, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4104
Closed
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@asbjornu
Copy link
Member

asbjornu commented May 6, 2024

We should have a test that verifies the contents of configuration.md against the default serialized configuration so we know the configuration is up to date and accurate. We do something like this for the CLI arguments already.

Originally posted by @asbjornu in #4009 (comment)

@arturcic arturcic added this to the 6.x milestone Jul 17, 2024
@arturcic arturcic self-assigned this Jul 17, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
If the configuration for a workflow will change the unit test will fail and will require to accept the new changes. These changes are then copied to the docs
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
If the configuration for a workflow will change the unit test will fail and will require to accept the new changes. These changes are then copied to the docs
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
If the configuration for a workflow will change the unit test will fail and will require to accept the new changes. These changes are then copied to the docs
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
If the configuration for a workflow will change the unit test will fail and will require to accept the new changes. These changes are then copied to the docs
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
arturcic added a commit to arturcic/GitVersion that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2024
@arturcic arturcic modified the milestones: 6.x, 6.0.0 Jul 22, 2024
@arturcic
Copy link
Member

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 6.0.0 🎉
The release is available on:

Your GitReleaseManager bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants