WireMock Related Changes #4100
WireMock Related Changes #4100
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request integrates comprehensive WireMock functionality into the application. Multiple UI pages and code-behind files have been updated or added to support both real and mock API operations. New controls, event handlers, and configuration classes enable users to toggle between API modes, manage WireMock mappings, and configure server connections. Additionally, project files and package references have been updated, and several utility methods have been introduced for JSON handling and stub generation. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant AP as APIModelPage
participant WM as WireMockMappingController
participant WA as WireMockAPI
participant WS as WireMock Server
U->>AP: Select "Mock API" / Initiate mapping operation
AP->>WM: Trigger mapping creation/update
WM->>WA: Call CreateMappingAsync()/UpdateStubAsync()
WA->>WS: Send HTTP request with mapping data
WS-->>WA: Return response (success/failure)
WA-->>WM: Forward response data
WM-->>AP: Update UI with new mapping status
AP->>U: Display updated mapping information
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (68)
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/DocumentEditorPage.xaml.cs (1)
43-45: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adjusting field access levels or converting them to properties.
DeclaringmockAPIaspublicwhile keepingisFromWireMockandwireMockmappingIdasprivatemay lead to inconsistent usage. If external access is needed, consider using properties or methods for controlled modification.Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs (1)
166-192: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor URL handling methods to improve efficiency and maintainability.
The current implementation has several issues:
- Creates new
APIModelPageinstances unnecessarily- Contains duplicated code
- Directly manipulates UI elements in non-UI methods
- Contains empty lines (171-172)
Consider this refactoring:
- private void UseMockedAPIURL(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) - { - foreach (var apiModel in mAPIModelFolder.GetFolderItems()) - { - APIModelPage apiModelPage = new APIModelPage(apiModel); - - - if (apiModelPage.xMockAPIRadioButton.IsChecked != true) - { - apiModelPage.CheckMockAPIRadioButton(); - } - apiModelPage.xMockAPIRadioButton_Checked(this, e); - } - } - - private void UseRealAPIURL(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) - { - foreach (var apiModel in mAPIModelFolder.GetFolderItems()) - { - APIModelPage apiModelPage = new APIModelPage(apiModel); - if (apiModelPage.xRealAPIRadioButton.IsChecked != true) - { - apiModelPage.CheckRealAPIRadioButton(); - } - apiModelPage.xRealAPIRadioButton_Checked(this, e); - } - } + private void UpdateAPIURLMode(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e, bool useMockURL) + { + foreach (var apiModel in mAPIModelFolder.GetFolderItems()) + { + var apiModelPage = new APIModelPage(apiModel); + if (useMockURL) + { + if (apiModelPage.xMockAPIRadioButton.IsChecked != true) + { + apiModelPage.CheckMockAPIRadioButton(); + apiModelPage.xMockAPIRadioButton_Checked(this, e); + } + } + else + { + if (apiModelPage.xRealAPIRadioButton.IsChecked != true) + { + apiModelPage.CheckRealAPIRadioButton(); + apiModelPage.xRealAPIRadioButton_Checked(this, e); + } + } + } + } + + private void UseMockedAPIURL(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) + { + UpdateAPIURLMode(sender, e, useMockURL: true); + } + + private void UseRealAPIURL(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) + { + UpdateAPIURLMode(sender, e, useMockURL: false); + }Additionally, consider moving the UI manipulation logic to a separate service class. Let's check if there are any existing service classes that handle API URL mode:
✅ Verification successful
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for existing service classes that handle API URL mode rg -l "APIUrl|UrlMode|MockUrl" --type csLength of output: 527
Refactoring Suggestion Verification: Consolidate API URL Handling
The investigation confirms that there isn’t an existing dedicated service class handling API URL mode (or UI manipulation for that matter) available for reuse—our search only returned several files related to WireMock and similar configurations. This validates the review comment’s concerns:
- The duplicated instantiation and UI updates in the URL handling methods can be consolidated (as shown by the proposed refactoring).
- To provide better separation of concerns, the UI manipulation logic should indeed be extracted into a separate service class (or helper), since no such dedicated service already exists.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private void UpdateAPIURLMode(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e, bool useMockURL) { foreach (var apiModel in mAPIModelFolder.GetFolderItems()) { var apiModelPage = new APIModelPage(apiModel); if (useMockURL) { if (apiModelPage.xMockAPIRadioButton.IsChecked != true) { apiModelPage.CheckMockAPIRadioButton(); apiModelPage.xMockAPIRadioButton_Checked(this, e); } } else { if (apiModelPage.xRealAPIRadioButton.IsChecked != true) { apiModelPage.CheckRealAPIRadioButton(); apiModelPage.xRealAPIRadioButton_Checked(this, e); } } } } private void UseMockedAPIURL(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { UpdateAPIURLMode(sender, e, useMockURL: true); } private void UseRealAPIURL(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { UpdateAPIURLMode(sender, e, useMockURL: false); }Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml (2)
13-17: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using dynamic row heights.
The fixed height of 50 for each row might not accommodate content properly across different DPI settings and localizations.
- <RowDefinition Height="50"/> - <RowDefinition Height="50"/> - <RowDefinition Height="50"/> + <RowDefinition Height="Auto"/> + <RowDefinition Height="Auto"/> + <RowDefinition Height="Auto"/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<Grid.RowDefinitions> <RowDefinition Height="Auto"/> <RowDefinition Height="Auto"/> <RowDefinition Height="Auto"/> </Grid.RowDefinitions>
28-31: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance accessibility and user experience of WireMock toggle.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- The CheckBox lacks a tooltip explaining its purpose
- The Label and CheckBox are not properly associated using
x:NameandTarget- Missing AutomationProperties for screen readers
- <Label Content="Do You want to Create WireMock Mapping ? " HorizontalAlignment="Left" VerticalAlignment="Center"/> - <CheckBox x:Name="xWireMockMappingToggle" IsEnabled="True" Width="50" Checked="xWireMockMappingToggle_Checked" HorizontalAlignment="Left" VerticalAlignment="Center"/> + <Label x:Name="xWireMockLabel" + Content="Do you want to create WireMock mapping?" + Target="{Binding ElementName=xWireMockMappingToggle}" + HorizontalAlignment="Left" + VerticalAlignment="Center"/> + <CheckBox x:Name="xWireMockMappingToggle" + IsEnabled="True" + Width="50" + Checked="xWireMockMappingToggle_Checked" + HorizontalAlignment="Left" + VerticalAlignment="Center" + ToolTip="Enable to automatically create WireMock mappings" + AutomationProperties.Name="Create WireMock Mapping" + AutomationProperties.HelpText="When enabled, WireMock mappings will be automatically created"/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<StackPanel Grid.Row="2" Grid.Column="0" Orientation="Horizontal"> <Label x:Name="xWireMockLabel" Content="Do you want to create WireMock mapping?" Target="{Binding ElementName=xWireMockMappingToggle}" HorizontalAlignment="Left" VerticalAlignment="Center"/> <CheckBox x:Name="xWireMockMappingToggle" IsEnabled="True" Width="50" Checked="xWireMockMappingToggle_Checked" HorizontalAlignment="Left" VerticalAlignment="Center" ToolTip="Enable to automatically create WireMock mappings" AutomationProperties.Name="Create WireMock Mapping" AutomationProperties.HelpText="When enabled, WireMock mappings will be automatically created"/> </StackPanel>Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs (1)
85-100:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove error handling and toggle behavior.
The current implementation has several issues:
- Missing null check for
AddAPIModelWizardinstance- No error handling for repository operations
- Missing
Uncheckedevent handler- Incomplete WireMock configuration validation
Apply this diff to address the issues:
+ private void ValidateAndSetWireMockConfiguration() + { + if (AddAPIModelWizard == null) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.Error, "AddAPIModelWizard instance not initialized"); + xWireMockMappingToggle.IsChecked = false; + return; + } + + try + { + WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository + .GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>() + .FirstOrDefault() ?? new WireMockConfiguration(); + + if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(mockConfiguration.WireMockUrl)) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionFail); + xWireMockMappingToggle.IsChecked = false; + return; + } + + // Additional validation of WireMock configuration + if (!Uri.TryCreate(mockConfiguration.WireMockUrl, UriKind.Absolute, out _)) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.Error, "Invalid WireMock URL format"); + xWireMockMappingToggle.IsChecked = false; + return; + } + + AddAPIModelWizard.toCreateWireMock = true; + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.Error, $"Failed to validate WireMock configuration: {ex.Message}"); + xWireMockMappingToggle.IsChecked = false; + } + } + - private void xWireMockMappingToggle_Checked(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) - { - WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration; - mockConfiguration = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>().Count == 0 ? new WireMockConfiguration() : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); - if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(mockConfiguration.WireMockUrl)) - { - - Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionFail); - - } - else - { - AddAPIModelWizard.toCreateWireMock = true; - } - - } + private void xWireMockMappingToggle_Checked(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) + { + ValidateAndSetWireMockConfiguration(); + } + + private void xWireMockMappingToggle_Unchecked(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) + { + if (AddAPIModelWizard != null) + { + AddAPIModelWizard.toCreateWireMock = false; + } + }Don't forget to update the XAML to include the
Uncheckedevent handler:- <CheckBox x:Name="xWireMockMappingToggle" IsEnabled="True" Width="50" Checked="xWireMockMappingToggle_Checked" HorizontalAlignment="Left" VerticalAlignment="Center"/> + <CheckBox x:Name="xWireMockMappingToggle" IsEnabled="True" Width="50" Checked="xWireMockMappingToggle_Checked" Unchecked="xWireMockMappingToggle_Unchecked" HorizontalAlignment="Left" VerticalAlignment="Center"/>Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs (6)
25-26: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Encapsulate public fields for maintainability.
While having
public WireMockMappingController wmControllerandpublic ApplicationAPIModel mApplicationAPIModelis convenient, consider exposing them through properties or making them private if they're not intended to be modified externally. This helps with encapsulation and future-proofing.
36-65: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Potential for grid view configuration reuse.
SetGridView()is setting up a robust grid, including columns, toolbar tools, etc. If there are other pages or modules that use a similar layout, consider extracting this grid logic into a shared utility method or user control to reduce duplication and ease maintenance.
79-168: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Method naming mismatch with actual behavior.
AddNewMappingAsyncsuggests adding a brand-new mapping, yet it fetches an existing mapping by ID and clones it. Consider renaming it to something likeCloneMappingAsyncorCopyMappingAsyncto better convey its purpose and avoid confusion.
79-168: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider factoring out JSON editing logic.
Both
AddNewMappingAsyncandxEditMappingbtn_Clickhave quite similar logic to retrieve mapping JSON, open an editor window, and update the mapping. Extracting this logic to a common helper or method can help reduce duplication and make your code easier to maintain.
194-215: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Fixed file path for JSON export.
Saving the file to
WireMockAPI_mappings.jsonin the working directory might overwrite previous exports. Consider prompting the user for a location or using a timestamped filename to avoid accidental overwriting.
334-358: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Confirm user intention for immediate deletion.
xDeleteMappingBtn_Clickpromptly removes mappings from both the server and the local grid. In some cases, a confirmation dialog might be prudent to prevent accidental deletions.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMapping.cs (4)
8-21: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding validation or default values for Mapping.
public string Name,public Request Request, andpublic Response Responsecould benefit from null checks or default initializations, especially if partial structure is passed from external sources. Ensure the application gracefully handles missing fields.
23-30: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Clarity on URL vs. urlPattern.
[JsonProperty("urlPattern")] public string Urlmight be slightly confusing. If it's indeed a pattern, consider naming the propertyUrlPatternin code too, aligning with the JSON payload. This helps maintain clarity between an exact URL match vs. a pattern-based route.
32-39: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Potential for advanced mocking structures.
Currently,
Response.Bodyis a simple string. If more complex scenarios arise (e.g., returning different headers or JSON objects), consider expanding theResponseclass to accommodate those properties.
50-54: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Leverage Meta for pagination or stats.
The
Metaclass includes onlyTotal. Should you need pagination or additional data from the WireMock server, you might expand it. Consider hooking it into the UI to display total mappings to the user.Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/External/Configurations/WireMockConfiguration.cs (1)
5-20: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Default name usage.
mName = "WireMockConfig"is a reasonable default, but ensure multiple configurations won't collide if the user adds more than one. If multiple configurations are possible, consider prompting for custom names or generating unique ones.Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml (2)
54-56: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Use correct icon size resource.
The delete button uses a 32x32 icon resource but displays it at 16x16, which could lead to quality loss. Use the 16x16 version of the delete icon instead.
- Source="{StaticResource @Delete_32x32}" + Source="{StaticResource @Delete_16x16}"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.Source="{StaticResource @Delete_16x16}" Height="16" Width="16" />
49-50: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Fix tooltip text for delete button.
The tooltip text "Deleting Mapping" should be "Delete Mapping" to maintain consistency with other button tooltips.
- ToolTip="Deleting Mapping" + ToolTip="Delete Mapping"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.ToolTip="Delete Mapping" Style="{StaticResource @InputImageGridCellButtonStyle}"Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml (2)
20-60: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider extracting common DataTemplate into a shared resource.
The
xMappingOperationTabDataTemplate is duplicated between WireMockTemplatePage.xaml and WireMockMappingPage.xaml. Consider moving it to a shared resource dictionary to improve maintainability.
50-50: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Fix tooltip text and icon size for consistency.
Same issues as in WireMockTemplatePage.xaml:
- Tooltip should be "Delete Mapping" instead of "Deleting Mapping"
- Delete icon uses 32x32 resource but is displayed at 16x16
- ToolTip="Deleting Mapping" + ToolTip="Delete Mapping" - Source="{StaticResource @Delete_32x32}" + Source="{StaticResource @Delete_16x16}"Also applies to: 55-55
Ginger/Ginger/ExternalConfigurations/WireMockConfigurationPage.xaml (1)
30-31: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using Grid.ColumnDefinition with proportional sizing.
Using fixed widths (230, 350*) might not scale well with different window sizes or DPI settings. Consider using proportional sizing with Grid.ColumnDefinition.
- <ColumnDefinition Width="230"/> - <ColumnDefinition Width="350*"/> + <ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/> + <ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.<ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/> <ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>Ginger/Ginger/ExternalConfigurations/WireMockConfigurationPage.xaml.cs (3)
121-135: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Use a single method for loader visibility management.
The
ShowLoaderandHideLoadermethods have duplicated Dispatcher.Invoke logic. Consider consolidating them into a single method.- public void HideLoader() - { - this.Dispatcher.Invoke(() => - { - xProcessingImage.Visibility = Visibility.Hidden; - }); - } - - public void ShowLoader() - { - this.Dispatcher.Invoke(() => - { - xProcessingImage.Visibility = Visibility.Visible; - }); - } + private void SetLoaderVisibility(bool visible) + { + this.Dispatcher.Invoke(() => + { + xProcessingImage.Visibility = visible ? Visibility.Visible : Visibility.Hidden; + }); + } + + public void ShowLoader() => SetLoaderVisibility(true); + public void HideLoader() => SetLoaderVisibility(false);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private void SetLoaderVisibility(bool visible) { this.Dispatcher.Invoke(() => { xProcessingImage.Visibility = visible ? Visibility.Visible : Visibility.Hidden; }); } public void ShowLoader() => SetLoaderVisibility(true); public void HideLoader() => SetLoaderVisibility(false);
65-87: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add timeout handling for API connection test.
The connection test lacks timeout handling, which could lead to the UI becoming unresponsive if the WireMock server is slow or unreachable.
private async void xTestConBtn_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { + using var cts = new CancellationTokenSource(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30)); try { if (xViewMappingBtn.Visibility == Visibility.Visible) { xViewMappingBtn.Visibility = Visibility.Collapsed; } GingerCoreNET.GeneralLib.General.CreateWireMockConfiguration(); ShowLoader(); xTestConBtn.IsEnabled = false; if (AreRequiredFieldsEmpty()) { Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.RequiredFieldsEmpty); return; } - bool isAuthorized = await mockAPI.TestWireMockConnectionAsync(wireMockConfiguration.WireMockUrl); + bool isAuthorized = await mockAPI.TestWireMockConnectionAsync(wireMockConfiguration.WireMockUrl) + .WithCancellation(cts.Token); ShowConnectionResult(isAuthorized); EnableMappingBtn(isAuthorized); + } catch (OperationCanceledException) { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionTimeout); + } finally { xTestConBtn.IsEnabled = true; HideLoader(); } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private async void xTestConBtn_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { using var cts = new CancellationTokenSource(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30)); try { if (xViewMappingBtn.Visibility == Visibility.Visible) { xViewMappingBtn.Visibility = Visibility.Collapsed; } GingerCoreNET.GeneralLib.General.CreateWireMockConfiguration(); ShowLoader(); xTestConBtn.IsEnabled = false; if (AreRequiredFieldsEmpty()) { Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.RequiredFieldsEmpty); return; } bool isAuthorized = await mockAPI.TestWireMockConnectionAsync(wireMockConfiguration.WireMockUrl) .WithCancellation(cts.Token); ShowConnectionResult(isAuthorized); EnableMappingBtn(isAuthorized); } catch (OperationCanceledException) { Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionTimeout); } finally { xTestConBtn.IsEnabled = true; HideLoader(); } }
36-37: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Encapsulate public fields as properties.
Public fields expose implementation details and break encapsulation. Convert them to properties with appropriate access modifiers.
- public WireMockConfiguration wireMockConfiguration; - public WireMockAPI mockAPI; + private WireMockConfiguration _wireMockConfiguration; + private WireMockAPI _mockAPI; + public WireMockConfiguration WireMockConfiguration => _wireMockConfiguration;Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingController.cs (12)
106-119: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove duplicate method.
This method is identical to
DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync. Consider removing it and usingDeserializeWireMockResponseAsyncinstead.
106-119: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove duplicate method.
This method is identical to
DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync. Consider removing it and usingDeserializeWireMockResponseAsyncinstead to maintain DRY principles.
106-119: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Eliminate code duplication by reusing
DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync.This method duplicates the logic from
DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync. Consider reusing that method to maintain DRY principles.public async Task<ObservableList<Mapping>> ShowApiModelApisAsync() { - try - { - string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); - WireMockResponse wireMockResponse = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<WireMockResponse>(jsonResponse); - return wireMockResponse?.Mappings ?? new ObservableList<Mapping>(); - } - catch (Exception ex) - { - Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while showing API model APIs.", ex); - return []; - } + return await DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync(); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public async Task<ObservableList<Mapping>> ShowApiModelApisAsync() { return await DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync(); }
69-82: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider reducing code duplication.
This method shares similar logic with
DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync. Consider refactoring to reuse the deserialization logic.public async Task<bool> IsWireMockMappingPresentAsync() { try { - string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); - WireMockResponse wireMockResponse = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<WireMockResponse>(jsonResponse); - return wireMockResponse?.Mappings?.Count > 0; + var mappings = await DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync(); + return mappings?.Count > 0; } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while checking for WireMock mappings.", ex); return false; } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public async Task<bool> IsWireMockMappingPresentAsync() { try { - string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); - WireMockResponse wireMockResponse = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<WireMockResponse>(jsonResponse); - return wireMockResponse?.Mappings?.Count > 0; + var mappings = await DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync(); + return mappings?.Count > 0; } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while checking for WireMock mappings.", ex); return false; } }
69-82: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider reusing existing deserialization logic.
This method duplicates logic from
DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync. Consider reusing that method to maintain DRY principles.public async Task<bool> IsWireMockMappingPresentAsync() { try { - string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); - WireMockResponse wireMockResponse = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<WireMockResponse>(jsonResponse); - return wireMockResponse?.Mappings?.Count > 0; + var mappings = await DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync(); + return mappings.Count > 0; } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while checking for WireMock mappings.", ex); return false; } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public async Task<bool> IsWireMockMappingPresentAsync() { try { var mappings = await DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync(); return mappings.Count > 0; } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while checking for WireMock mappings.", ex); return false; } }
34-46: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding server availability check.
While error handling is good, consider checking server availability before making the request to provide a better user experience.
public async Task<string> DownloadWireMockMappingsAsync() { try { + bool isServerUp = await mockAPI.TestWireMockConnectionAsync(mockAPI._baseUrl); + if (!isServerUp) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "WireMock server is not available."); + return string.Empty; + } string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); return jsonResponse; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public async Task<string> DownloadWireMockMappingsAsync() { try { bool isServerUp = await mockAPI.TestWireMockConnectionAsync(mockAPI._baseUrl); if (!isServerUp) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "WireMock server is not available."); return string.Empty; } string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); return jsonResponse; } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while downloading WireMock mappings.", ex); return string.Empty; } }
34-46: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add response validation.
Consider validating the response before returning it to ensure it meets expected format/content requirements.
public async Task<string> DownloadWireMockMappingsAsync() { try { string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); + if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(jsonResponse)) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "Empty response received from WireMock API."); + return string.Empty; + } return jsonResponse; } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while downloading WireMock mappings.", ex); return string.Empty; } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public async Task<string> DownloadWireMockMappingsAsync() { try { string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(jsonResponse)) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "Empty response received from WireMock API."); return string.Empty; } return jsonResponse; } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while downloading WireMock mappings.", ex); return string.Empty; } }
34-46: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add input validation for the base URL.
While the error handling is good, consider validating that
mockAPIand its base URL are properly initialized before making the request.public async Task<string> DownloadWireMockMappingsAsync() { try { + if (mockAPI?.BaseUrl == null) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "WireMock API is not properly initialized."); + return string.Empty; + } string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); return jsonResponse; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public async Task<string> DownloadWireMockMappingsAsync() { try { if (mockAPI?.BaseUrl == null) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "WireMock API is not properly initialized."); return string.Empty; } string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); return jsonResponse; } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while downloading WireMock mappings.", ex); return string.Empty; } }
122-149:
⚠️ Potential issueFix reversed logic in server status check.
The method's logic contradicts its comment. It returns empty when the server is up, but the comment suggests it should mock the request when the production server is down.
// if production server is down, do a mock server request public async Task<string> MockServerRequestAsync(string requestUrl) { try { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(requestUrl)) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Request URL cannot be null or empty"); return string.Empty; } bool isServerUp = await mockAPI.TestWireMockConnectionAsync(requestUrl); - if (!isServerUp) + if (isServerUp) { - string response = await mockAPI.GetStubAsync(requestUrl); - return response; + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.INFO, "Production server is up, no need to mock the request."); + return string.Empty; } - else - { - Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Production server is up, no need to mock the request."); - return string.Empty; - } + string response = await mockAPI.GetStubAsync(requestUrl); + return response; } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while making a mock server request.", ex); return string.Empty; } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public async Task<string> MockServerRequestAsync(string requestUrl) { try { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(requestUrl)) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Request URL cannot be null or empty"); return string.Empty; } bool isServerUp = await mockAPI.TestWireMockConnectionAsync(requestUrl); if (isServerUp) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.INFO, "Production server is up, no need to mock the request."); return string.Empty; } string response = await mockAPI.GetStubAsync(requestUrl); return response; } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while making a mock server request.", ex); return string.Empty; } }
122-149: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Extract error message as constant.
Consider extracting the error message "Production server is up, no need to mock the request." as a constant to maintain consistency and ease of maintenance.
public class WireMockMappingController { + private const string PRODUCTION_SERVER_UP_MESSAGE = "Production server is up, no need to mock the request."; // ... existing code ... public async Task<string> MockServerRequestAsync(string requestUrl) { try { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(requestUrl)) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Request URL cannot be null or empty"); return string.Empty; } bool isServerUp = await mockAPI.TestWireMockConnectionAsync(requestUrl); if (!isServerUp) { string response = await mockAPI.GetStubAsync(requestUrl); return response; } else { - Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Production server is up, no need to mock the request."); + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, PRODUCTION_SERVER_UP_MESSAGE); return string.Empty; } } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while making a mock server request.", ex); return string.Empty; } } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public class WireMockMappingController { private const string PRODUCTION_SERVER_UP_MESSAGE = "Production server is up, no need to mock the request."; public async Task<string> MockServerRequestAsync(string requestUrl) { try { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(requestUrl)) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Request URL cannot be null or empty"); return string.Empty; } bool isServerUp = await mockAPI.TestWireMockConnectionAsync(requestUrl); if (!isServerUp) { string response = await mockAPI.GetStubAsync(requestUrl); return response; } else { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, PRODUCTION_SERVER_UP_MESSAGE); return string.Empty; } } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while making a mock server request.", ex); return string.Empty; } } }
122-149: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Improve error message for server up status.
The error message when the production server is up could be more informative by including the server URL.
- Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Production server is up, no need to mock the request."); + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.INFO, $"Production server at {requestUrl} is up, no need to mock the request.");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public async Task<string> MockServerRequestAsync(string requestUrl) { try { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(requestUrl)) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Request URL cannot be null or empty"); return string.Empty; } bool isServerUp = await mockAPI.TestWireMockConnectionAsync(requestUrl); if (!isServerUp) { string response = await mockAPI.GetStubAsync(requestUrl); return response; } else { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.INFO, $"Production server at {requestUrl} is up, no need to mock the request."); return string.Empty; } } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while making a mock server request.", ex); return string.Empty; } }
18-31: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add input validation for the JSON response.
The method handles deserialization errors well, but consider adding input validation for the JSON response before attempting deserialization to prevent potential issues with malformed JSON.
public async Task<ObservableList<Mapping>> DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync() { try { string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); + if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(jsonResponse)) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "Empty JSON response received from WireMock API."); + return []; + } WireMockResponse wireMockResponse = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<WireMockResponse>(jsonResponse); return wireMockResponse?.Mappings ?? new ObservableList<Mapping>(); } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while deserializing the WireMock response.", ex); return []; } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public async Task<ObservableList<Mapping>> DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync() { try { string jsonResponse = await mockAPI.ViewMappingAsync(); if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(jsonResponse)) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "Empty JSON response received from WireMock API."); return []; } WireMockResponse wireMockResponse = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<WireMockResponse>(jsonResponse); return wireMockResponse?.Mappings ?? new ObservableList<Mapping>(); } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "An error occurred while deserializing the WireMock response.", ex); return []; } }Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs (8)
164-168:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for URI creation.
The
RemovingURLPathQuerymethod should include error handling for invalid URLs.public static string RemovingURLPathQuery(string url) { + try + { Uri uri = new Uri(url); return uri.PathAndQuery; + } + catch (UriFormatException ex) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, $"Invalid URL format: {url}", ex); + return url; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public static string RemovingURLPathQuery(string url) { try { Uri uri = new Uri(url); return uri.PathAndQuery; } catch (UriFormatException ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, $"Invalid URL format: {url}", ex); return url; } }
164-168: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for invalid URLs in RemovingURLPathQuery.
The method should handle invalid URLs gracefully.
public static string RemovingURLPathQuery(string url) { + if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(url)) + { + return string.Empty; + } + try + { Uri uri = new Uri(url); return uri.PathAndQuery; + } + catch (UriFormatException ex) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Invalid URL format", ex); + return url; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.{ if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(url)) { return string.Empty; } try { Uri uri = new Uri(url); return uri.PathAndQuery; } catch (UriFormatException ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Invalid URL format", ex); return url; } }
154-157:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incomplete method implementation.
The
GetEnumValueDescriptionmethod contains an incomplete if statement that will cause compilation errors.- if (value == ) - { - - }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
154-157:
⚠️ Potential issueComplete the implementation of
GetEnumValueDescription.The method has an incomplete if statement that could lead to runtime errors.
- if (value == ) - { - - }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
154-157:
⚠️ Potential issueFix the incomplete if condition in GetEnumValueDescription.
The if condition is incomplete and will cause a compilation error.
- if (value == ) + if (value == null) { - + return string.Empty; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (value == null) { return string.Empty; }
100-151: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using Uri.TryCreate for URL validation.
The URL processing logic could be improved by using
Uri.TryCreatefor better URL validation.public static string TrimApiEndpointUrl(string url) { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(url)) { return url; } try { + if (!Uri.TryCreate(url, UriKind.RelativeOrAbsolute, out _)) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, $"Invalid URL format: {url}"); + return url; + } // Remove content within curly braces {} url = Regex.Replace(url, @"\{.*?\}", string.Empty);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public static string TrimApiEndpointUrl(string url) { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(url)) { return url; } try { if (!Uri.TryCreate(url, UriKind.RelativeOrAbsolute, out _)) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, $"Invalid URL format: {url}"); return url; } // Remove content within curly braces {} url = Regex.Replace(url, @"\{.*?\}", string.Empty); // Remove everything after '?' to exclude query parameters int queryIndex = url.IndexOf('?'); if (queryIndex >= 0) { url = url.Substring(0, queryIndex); } // Remove trailing parameters enclosed in <{ }> int startIndex = url.IndexOf("<{"); while (startIndex >= 0) { int endIndex = url.IndexOf("}>", startIndex); if (endIndex >= 0) { url = url.Remove(startIndex, endIndex - startIndex + 2); } else { break; } startIndex = url.IndexOf("<{"); } // Remove angle icons url = Regex.Replace(url, @"<.*?>", string.Empty); // Normalize slashes (remove duplicate or trailing slashes) url = Regex.Replace(url, @"[\\/]+", "/"); // Replace numeric IDs in the path with a wildcard pattern url = Regex.Replace(url, @"/\d+", "/"); return url + ".*"; } catch (UriFormatException ex) { // Handle the exception if the URL is not in a valid format Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Invalid URL format", ex); return url; } }
163-168: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add URL validation in
RemovingURLPathQuery.The method should validate the URL before creating a new Uri to prevent potential exceptions.
public static string RemovingURLPathQuery(string url) { + if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(url) || !Uri.IsWellFormedUriString(url, UriKind.Absolute)) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Invalid URL format"); + return string.Empty; + } Uri uri = new Uri(url); return uri.PathAndQuery; }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public static string RemovingURLPathQuery(string url) { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(url) || !Uri.IsWellFormedUriString(url, UriKind.Absolute)) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Invalid URL format"); return string.Empty; } Uri uri = new Uri(url); return uri.PathAndQuery; }
35-65: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance security of stub template.
The stub template accepts any request body with
"matches": ".*", which could be a security risk. Consider implementing stricter validation patterns.bodyPatterns = new[] { - new { matches = ".*" } + new { matches = "^(?!.*(<script|javascript:)).*$" } },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.var stubTemplate = new { name = model.Name, request = new { method = model.RequestType.ToString(), urlPattern = $"{trimmedUrl}", bodyPatterns = new[] { new { matches = "^(?!.*(<script|javascript:)).*$" } }, headers = new { Content_Type = new { matches = $"{ReqcontentType}.*" }, }, }, response = new { status = 200, body = "This is a generic mock response", // as per the request template headers = new { Content_Type = RescontentType, } } };Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockAPI.cs (6)
31-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Configure HttpClient properly.
The current implementation creates and disposes HttpClient instances frequently, which is not recommended. Consider using HttpClientFactory or a static HttpClient instance with proper timeout configuration.
public class WireMockAPI { public WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration; private readonly string _baseUrl; private const string MappingEndpoint = "/mappings"; private const string StartRecordingEndpoint = "/recordings/start"; private const string StopRecordingEndpoint = "/recordings/stop"; private bool isServerUp; + private static readonly HttpClient _httpClient; + + static WireMockAPI() + { + _httpClient = new HttpClient + { + Timeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30) + }; + } public WireMockAPI() { mockConfiguration = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>().Count == 0 ? new WireMockConfiguration() : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); _baseUrl = mockConfiguration.WireMockUrl; }Then replace all instances of
using (HttpClient client = new HttpClient())with the static_httpClient.Also applies to: 49-55, 69-76, 97-103, 117-128, 142-148, 162-169, 183-189, 203-209
31-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Implement IHttpClientFactory pattern for better resource management.
The current implementation creates new HttpClient instances for each request, which can lead to socket exhaustion. Consider using IHttpClientFactory pattern for better resource management and connection pooling.
+private readonly IHttpClientFactory _httpClientFactory; + +public WireMockAPI(IHttpClientFactory httpClientFactory) +{ + _httpClientFactory = httpClientFactory; mockConfiguration = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>().Count == 0 ? new WireMockConfiguration() : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); _baseUrl = mockConfiguration.WireMockUrl; +} public async Task<bool> TestWireMockConnectionAsync(string url) { try { - using (HttpClient client = new HttpClient()) - { + using var client = _httpClientFactory.CreateClient("WireMock"); HttpResponseMessage response = await client.GetAsync(url); return response.IsSuccessStatusCode; - } }Also applies to: 49-55, 69-76, 97-103, 117-128, 142-148, 162-169, 183-189, 203-209
13-14: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Make fields readonly.
The fields
mockConfigurationand_baseUrlshould be marked as readonly since they're only set in the constructor.- public WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration; - private readonly string _baseUrl; + public readonly WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration; + private readonly string _baseUrl;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public readonly WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration; private readonly string _baseUrl;
13-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use HttpClient as a singleton.
Creating new HttpClient instances for each request can lead to socket exhaustion. Consider using HttpClientFactory or a static HttpClient instance.
public class WireMockAPI { public WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration; private readonly string _baseUrl; private const string MappingEndpoint = "/mappings"; private const string StartRecordingEndpoint = "/recordings/start"; private const string StopRecordingEndpoint = "/recordings/stop"; private bool isServerUp; + private static readonly HttpClient _httpClient = new HttpClient(); public WireMockAPI() { mockConfiguration = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>().Count == 0 ? new WireMockConfiguration() : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); _baseUrl = mockConfiguration.WireMockUrl; + _httpClient.Timeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30); }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public class WireMockAPI { public WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration; private readonly string _baseUrl; private const string MappingEndpoint = "/mappings"; private const string StartRecordingEndpoint = "/recordings/start"; private const string StopRecordingEndpoint = "/recordings/stop"; private bool isServerUp; private static readonly HttpClient _httpClient = new HttpClient(); public WireMockAPI() { mockConfiguration = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>().Count == 0 ? new WireMockConfiguration() : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); _baseUrl = mockConfiguration.WireMockUrl; _httpClient.Timeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30); } }
13-24: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add timeout configuration for HTTP requests.
Configure a reasonable timeout for HTTP requests to prevent hanging operations.
public WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration; private readonly string _baseUrl; +private readonly TimeSpan _timeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30); private const string MappingEndpoint = "/mappings"; private const string StartRecordingEndpoint = "/recordings/start"; private const string StopRecordingEndpoint = "/recordings/stop"; private bool isServerUp; -public WireMockAPI() +public WireMockAPI(IHttpClientFactory httpClientFactory) { + _httpClientFactory = httpClientFactory; mockConfiguration = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>().Count == 0 ? new WireMockConfiguration() : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); _baseUrl = mockConfiguration.WireMockUrl; + + var client = _httpClientFactory.CreateClient("WireMock"); + client.Timeout = _timeout; }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
27-41: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add timeout configuration to TestWireMockConnectionAsync.
The method should have a shorter timeout for connection testing to prevent long waits.
public async Task<bool> TestWireMockConnectionAsync(string url) { try { - using (HttpClient client = new HttpClient()) - { - HttpResponseMessage response = await client.GetAsync(url); - return response.IsSuccessStatusCode; - } + using var cts = new CancellationTokenSource(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5)); + var response = await _httpClient.GetAsync(url, cts.Token); + return response.IsSuccessStatusCode; } catch { return false; } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public async Task<bool> TestWireMockConnectionAsync(string url) { try { using var cts = new CancellationTokenSource(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5)); var response = await _httpClient.GetAsync(url, cts.Token); return response.IsSuccessStatusCode; } catch { return false; } }Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/EnumsLib/eImageType.cs (1)
184-186: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Standardize the naming convention for WireMock logo enums.
The naming convention is inconsistent between the three WireMock logo enum values:
WireMockLogoWireMock_Logo(uses underscore)WireMockLogo16x16(includes size)Apply this diff to standardize the naming:
- WireMockLogo, - WireMock_Logo, - WireMockLogo16x16, + WireMockLogo, + WireMockLogoAlt, + WireMockLogoSmall,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.WireMockLogo, WireMockLogoAlt, WireMockLogoSmall,Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs (2)
60-60: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Follow C# naming conventions for public fields.
The field should be renamed to follow C# naming conventions (PascalCase for public fields).
Apply this diff:
- public bool toCreateWireMock; + public bool ToCreateWireMock;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public bool ToCreateWireMock;
146-153: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and progress reporting in CreateWireMockMappingsAsync.
The method has several issues:
- The method name suggests it's async but it's not.
- Missing error handling for potential exceptions during mapping creation.
- No progress reporting for bulk operations.
Apply this diff to improve the implementation:
- private void CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(ObservableList<ApplicationAPIModel> SelectedAAMList) + private async Task CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(ObservableList<ApplicationAPIModel> SelectedAAMList) { + try + { + int total = SelectedAAMList.Count; + int current = 0; foreach (ApplicationAPIModel appmodel in SelectedAAMList) { - WireMockMappingGenerator.CreateWireMockMapping(appmodel); + await Task.Run(() => WireMockMappingGenerator.CreateWireMockMapping(appmodel)); + current++; + OnPropertyChanged(nameof(Progress), $"Creating WireMock mappings... ({current}/{total})"); } + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingCreationError, ex.Message); + throw; + } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private async Task CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(ObservableList<ApplicationAPIModel> SelectedAAMList) { try { int total = SelectedAAMList.Count; int current = 0; foreach (ApplicationAPIModel appmodel in SelectedAAMList) { await Task.Run(() => WireMockMappingGenerator.CreateWireMockMapping(appmodel)); current++; OnPropertyChanged(nameof(Progress), $"Creating WireMock mappings... ({current}/{total})"); } } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingCreationError, ex.Message); throw; } }Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ActionsLib/Webservices/ActWebAPIModelOperation.cs (2)
15-15: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Encapsulate mockConfiguration field.
The field should be private with a public property to maintain encapsulation.
Apply this diff:
- public WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration; + private WireMockConfiguration _mockConfiguration; + public WireMockConfiguration MockConfiguration + { + get => _mockConfiguration; + private set => _mockConfiguration = value; + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private WireMockConfiguration _mockConfiguration; public WireMockConfiguration MockConfiguration { get => _mockConfiguration; private set => _mockConfiguration = value; }
19-19: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Extract mock configuration initialization to a separate method.
The initialization logic should be moved to a separate method for better readability and maintainability.
Apply this diff:
- mockConfiguration = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>().Count == 0 ? new WireMockConfiguration() : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); + MockConfiguration = InitializeMockConfiguration(); + private WireMockConfiguration InitializeMockConfiguration() + { + var configurations = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>(); + return configurations.Count == 0 + ? new WireMockConfiguration() + : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.// Assuming this line is inside your method (e.g., Initialize or Execute) MockConfiguration = InitializeMockConfiguration(); // Add the new helper method at the class level private WireMockConfiguration InitializeMockConfiguration() { var configurations = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>(); return configurations.Count == 0 ? new WireMockConfiguration() : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); }Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml.cs (3)
160-173: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use constants for file paths and improve path handling.
The code uses hardcoded path separators and string concatenation for path handling.
Apply this diff to improve path handling:
- string SolFolder = mSolution.Folder; - if (SolFolder.EndsWith(@"\")) - { - SolFolder = SolFolder[..^1]; - } - string mConfigFileFolderPath = SolFolder + @"\Documents\WireMockMappings\"; + string solFolder = mSolution.Folder.TrimEnd(Path.DirectorySeparatorChar); + string mConfigFileFolderPath = Path.Combine(solFolder, "Documents", "WireMockMappings");📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.mSolution = WorkSpace.Instance.Solution; - string SolFolder = mSolution.Folder; - if (SolFolder.EndsWith(@"\")) - { - SolFolder = SolFolder[..^1]; - } - string mConfigFileFolderPath = SolFolder + @"\Documents\WireMockMappings\"; + string solFolder = mSolution.Folder.TrimEnd(Path.DirectorySeparatorChar); + string mConfigFileFolderPath = Path.Combine(solFolder, "Documents", "WireMockMappings"); if (!System.IO.Directory.Exists(mConfigFileFolderPath)) { System.IO.Directory.CreateDirectory(mConfigFileFolderPath); } string filePath = Path.Combine(mConfigFileFolderPath, "WireMockMappings.json"); File.WriteAllText(filePath, mappingJson);
219-286: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Improve UI/UX for editing WireMock mappings.
The current implementation uses a basic TextBox for JSON editing, which lacks syntax highlighting and validation.
Consider using a specialized JSON editor control that provides:
- Syntax highlighting
- JSON validation
- Code folding
- Search/replace functionality
Example implementation:
- TextBox jsonTextBox = new TextBox - { - Text = mappingJson, - IsReadOnly = false, - TextWrapping = TextWrapping.Wrap, - VerticalScrollBarVisibility = ScrollBarVisibility.Auto, - HorizontalScrollBarVisibility = ScrollBarVisibility.Auto, - AcceptsReturn = true - }; + JsonEditor jsonEditor = new JsonEditor + { + JsonText = mappingJson, + IsReadOnly = false, + Height = 300, + Width = 550 + };Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
103-127:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect error message mapping in DeleteButton_Click.
The error message mapping is reversed:
- Success case shows
WireMockConnectionFail- Failure case shows
WireMockAPIErrorApply this diff to fix the error messages:
- if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(result)) - { - // Remove the mapping from the grid - xGridMapping.DataSourceList.Remove(mapping); - Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionFail); - } - else - { - Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError); - } + if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(result)) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionFail); + } + else + { + // Remove the mapping from the grid + xGridMapping.DataSourceList.Remove(mapping); + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDeleteSuccess); + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private async void DeleteButton_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { if (sender is Button button && button.DataContext is Mapping mapping) { try { string result = await wmController.mockAPI.DeleteStubAsync(mapping.Id); if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(result)) { Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionFail); } else { // Remove the mapping from the grid xGridMapping.DataSourceList.Remove(mapping); Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDeleteSuccess); } } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Failed to delete WireMock mapping", ex); Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError); } } }Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/AddSolutionPage.xaml.cs (1)
141-141: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for WireMock configuration creation.
The WireMock configuration creation is not wrapped in a try-catch block, which could lead to unhandled exceptions.
Apply this diff to add error handling:
- GingerCoreNET.GeneralLib.General.CreateWireMockConfiguration(); + try + { + GingerCoreNET.GeneralLib.General.CreateWireMockConfiguration(); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "Failed to create WireMock configuration", ex); + // Continue with solution creation as WireMock is optional + }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.try { GingerCoreNET.GeneralLib.General.CreateWireMockConfiguration(); } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.WARN, "Failed to create WireMock configuration", ex); // Continue with solution creation as WireMock is optional }Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Actions/Webservices/ActWebAPIBase.cs (2)
95-96: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Add XML documentation for the MockAPIURL field.
The new MockAPIURL field lacks documentation explaining its purpose and usage.
Add XML documentation:
+ /// <summary> + /// The URL for the mock API endpoint when using WireMock. + /// This field is used when UseRealAPI is set to false. + /// </summary> public static string MockAPIURL = "MockAPIURL";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// The URL for the mock API endpoint when using WireMock. /// This field is used when UseRealAPI is set to false. /// </summary> public static string MockAPIURL = "MockAPIURL";
100-100: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add XML documentation and consider making UseRealAPI configurable.
The UseRealAPI property lacks documentation and is hardcoded to true.
Apply this diff to improve the property:
+ /// <summary> + /// Gets or sets whether to use the real API endpoint (true) or the mock API endpoint (false). + /// Default is true to maintain backward compatibility. + /// </summary> - public bool UseRealAPI = true; + public bool UseRealAPI { get; set; } = true;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements./// <summary> /// Gets or sets whether to use the real API endpoint (true) or the mock API endpoint (false). /// Default is true to maintain backward compatibility. /// </summary> public bool UseRealAPI { get; set; } = true;Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/UCTreeView/TreeViewItemGenericBase.cs (1)
211-232: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling in CreateWireMockMappingHandler.
The error handling could be more specific and provide better user feedback.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
private async void CreateWireMockMappingHandler(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { try { object item = ((ITreeViewItem)this).NodeObject(); if (item is RepositoryItemBase repositoryItem) { + if (!(item is ApplicationAPIModel)) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticWarnMessage, "WireMock mapping is only supported for API models."); + return; + } + await WireMockMappingGenerator.CreateWireMockMapping((ApplicationAPIModel)item); Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.ShowInfoMessage, "WireMock mapping created successfully."); } else { Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticWarnMessage, "WireMock mapping creation is not supported for this item type."); } } + catch (InvalidOperationException ex) + { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Invalid operation during WireMock mapping creation", ex); + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticWarnMessage, $"Failed to create WireMock mapping: {ex.Message}"); + } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Error occurred while creating WireMock mapping", ex); Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticWarnMessage, "An error occurred while creating WireMock mapping. Please check the logs for more details."); } }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private async void CreateWireMockMappingHandler(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { try { object item = ((ITreeViewItem)this).NodeObject(); if (item is RepositoryItemBase repositoryItem) { if (!(item is ApplicationAPIModel)) { Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticWarnMessage, "WireMock mapping is only supported for API models."); return; } await WireMockMappingGenerator.CreateWireMockMapping((ApplicationAPIModel)item); Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.ShowInfoMessage, "WireMock mapping created successfully."); } else { Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticWarnMessage, "WireMock mapping creation is not supported for this item type."); } } catch (InvalidOperationException ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Invalid operation during WireMock mapping creation", ex); Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticWarnMessage, $"Failed to create WireMock mapping: {ex.Message}"); } catch (Exception ex) { Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Error occurred while creating WireMock mapping", ex); Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticWarnMessage, "An error occurred while creating WireMock mapping. Please check the logs for more details."); } }Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs (1)
1023-1026: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove async modifier from method without await.
The method is marked as async but doesn't use any await operations. Remove the async modifier to avoid unnecessary overhead.
Apply this diff:
-public async void xMockAPIRadioButton_Checked(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) +public void xMockAPIRadioButton_Checked(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.public void xMockAPIRadioButton_Checked(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { mApplicationAPIModel.UseRealAPI = false; }Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/WebServicesDriver/HttpWebClientUtils.cs (4)
46-46: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider improving encapsulation of the mockConfiguration field.
The field should be:
- Made private to hide implementation details
- Made readonly to prevent external modifications
- Initialized in the constructor if possible
Apply this diff to improve encapsulation:
-public WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration; +private readonly WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.private readonly WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration;
355-355: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Cache the WireMockConfiguration to improve performance.
The code retrieves WireMockConfiguration from the repository on every request. Consider caching it in the constructor or when first needed.
-mockConfiguration = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>().Count == 0 ? new WireMockConfiguration() : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); +if (mockConfiguration == null) +{ + mockConfiguration = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>().Count == 0 + ? new WireMockConfiguration() + : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.if (mockConfiguration == null) { mockConfiguration = WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetAllRepositoryItems<WireMockConfiguration>().Count == 0 ? new WireMockConfiguration() : WorkSpace.Instance.SolutionRepository.GetFirstRepositoryItem<WireMockConfiguration>(); }
360-360: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Remove commented code.
Remove the commented line as it's not being used and may cause confusion.
-//string mockurlendpoint = mAct.GetInputParamCalculatedValue(ActWebAPIBase.Fields.MockAPIURL);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
356-365: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add null check and improve URL transformation logic.
The code should:
- Check if mockUrl is null before using it
- Extract URL transformation logic to a separate method for better maintainability
Apply this diff to improve the code:
-string mockUrl = mockConfiguration.WireMockUrl; -if (mockUrl != null) -{ - // http://petstore.com/api/v3/pet -> http://wiremock:port/api/v3/pet - //string mockurlendpoint = mAct.GetInputParamCalculatedValue(ActWebAPIBase.Fields.MockAPIURL); - Uri uri = new Uri(url); - string path = uri.PathAndQuery; - string newUrl = mockUrl.Replace("/__admin", string.Empty); - Client.BaseAddress = new Uri(newUrl + path); -} +string mockUrl = mockConfiguration?.WireMockUrl; +if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(mockUrl)) +{ + mAct.Error = "Request setup Failed because of missing/wrong input"; + mAct.ExInfo = "Mock URL is missing"; + return false; +} + +Client.BaseAddress = GetMockEndpointUrl(url, mockUrl); +private Uri GetMockEndpointUrl(string originalUrl, string mockUrl) +{ + Uri uri = new Uri(originalUrl); + string path = uri.PathAndQuery; + string newUrl = mockUrl.Replace("/__admin", string.Empty); + return new Uri(newUrl + path); +}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.string mockUrl = mockConfiguration?.WireMockUrl; if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(mockUrl)) { mAct.Error = "Request setup Failed because of missing/wrong input"; mAct.ExInfo = "Mock URL is missing"; return false; } Client.BaseAddress = GetMockEndpointUrl(url, mockUrl); // ... // Other code in the method (if any) // Add the new helper method at the appropriate location in the class (outside of any other method) private Uri GetMockEndpointUrl(string originalUrl, string mockUrl) { Uri uri = new Uri(originalUrl); string path = uri.PathAndQuery; string newUrl = mockUrl.Replace("/__admin", string.Empty); return new Uri(newUrl + path); }Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/ReporterLib/UserMsgsPool.cs (1)
816-825: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance message types and content for better error handling.
While the message structure is consistent, consider these improvements:
- Use
eUserMsgType.ERRORfor failure cases instead ofINFO:
- WireMockConnectionFail
- WireMockMappingDownloadFailed
- WireMockAPIError
- WireMockMappingUpdateFail
- WireMockMappingDeleteFail
- Add more descriptive error messages with actionable information.
Here's the suggested implementation:
- { eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionFail, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.INFO, "WireMock Connection Fail", " WireMock Connection Failed.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, + { eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionFail, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.ERROR, "WireMock Connection Failed", "Failed to connect to WireMock server. Please check the server URL and credentials.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, - { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDownloadFailed, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.INFO, "WireMock Mapping Download", " WireMock Mapping download failed.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, + { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDownloadFailed, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.ERROR, "WireMock Mapping Download Failed", "Failed to download WireMock mapping. Please verify server connectivity and try again.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, - { eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.INFO, "WireMock API Issue", " WireMock API got issue, please check server.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, + { eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.ERROR, "WireMock API Error", "An error occurred while communicating with WireMock API. Please check server status and configuration.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, - { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingUpdateFail, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.INFO, "WireMock Mapping", "WireMock mapping failed to Update, please check server", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, + { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingUpdateFail, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.ERROR, "WireMock Mapping Update Failed", "Failed to update WireMock mapping. Please verify server connectivity and mapping configuration.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, - { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDeleteFail, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.INFO, "WireMock Mapping", "WireMock mapping failed to delete, please check server.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, + { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDeleteFail, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.ERROR, "WireMock Mapping Delete Failed", "Failed to delete WireMock mapping. Please verify server connectivity and mapping exists.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.{ eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionFail, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.ERROR, "WireMock Connection Failed", "Failed to connect to WireMock server. Please check the server URL and credentials.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, { eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionSuccess, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.INFO, "WireMock Connection Success", " WireMock Connection Successful.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDownload, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.INFO, "WireMock Mapping Download", " WireMock Mapping downloaded Successful.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDownloadFailed, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.ERROR, "WireMock Mapping Download Failed", "Failed to download WireMock mapping. Please verify server connectivity and try again.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingEmpty, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.INFO, "No WireMock Mapping Found", " No WireMock Mapping Available to Show.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, { eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.ERROR, "WireMock API Error", "An error occurred while communicating with WireMock API. Please check server status and configuration.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingUpdateFail, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.ERROR, "WireMock Mapping Update Failed", "Failed to update WireMock mapping. Please verify server connectivity and mapping configuration.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingUpdateSuccess, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.INFO, "WireMock Mapping", "WireMock mapping successfully Updated.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDeleteSuccess, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.INFO, "WireMock Mapping", "WireMock mapping successfully Deleted.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) }, { eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDeleteFail, new UserMsg(eUserMsgType.ERROR, "WireMock Mapping Delete Failed", "Failed to delete WireMock mapping. Please verify server connectivity and mapping exists.", eUserMsgOption.OK, eUserMsgSelection.None) },
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/.editorconfig(0 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/.editorconfig
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs (1)
140-140: Verify necessity of removing numeric IDs in the path.Regex-replacing numeric IDs with a wildcard pattern (line 140) may accidentally over-match unrelated endpoints. If your intent is to match any integer-based resource identifier, confirm that this approach doesn’t cause conflicts with other numeric segments of the URL that should remain unique.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 21
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Actions/Webservices/ActWebAPIBase.cs (1)
108-116:⚠️ Potential issueFix method implementation to match its name.
The method
FormDataToAIVConverterhas a misleading implementation:
- The method name suggests it converts form data, but it's using
RequestKeyValuesinstead of theBodyKeyValueListparameter- The parameter
BodyKeyValueListis unused-private ObservableList<ActInputValue> FormDataToAIVConverter(ObservableList<WebAPIKeyBodyValues> BodyKeyValueList) +private ObservableList<ActInputValue> FormDataToAIVConverter(ObservableList<WebAPIKeyBodyValues> bodyKeyValues) { ObservableList<ActInputValue> fa = []; - foreach (WebAPIKeyBodyValues wiv in RequestKeyValues) + foreach (WebAPIKeyBodyValues wiv in bodyKeyValues) { fa.Add(wiv); } return fa; }
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs (1)
24-72: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Adopt asynchronous naming convention.
The method is asynchronous, so it’s recommended to end its name with “Async” (e.g.,
CreateWireMockMappingAsync) for clarity and consistency with common .NET practices.-public async Task CreateWireMockMapping(ApplicationAPIModel model) +public async Task CreateWireMockMappingAsync(ApplicationAPIModel model)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs(4 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Actions/Webservices/ActWebAPIBase.cs(2 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/WebServicesDriver/HttpWebClientUtils.cs(5 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockAPI.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockAPI.cs (1)
19-23: Consider validating or defaulting_baseUrl.
IfmockConfiguration.WireMockUrlis null or empty, calling these APIs can fail at runtime. You might want to ensure that_baseUrlis properly validated (e.g., if null or empty, log a warning or set a default).Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Actions/Webservices/ActWebAPIBase.cs (3)
98-105: LGTM! Well-structured observable collections.The observable collections are properly marked for serialization and follow a consistent pattern. The separation into distinct lists for dynamic elements, HTTP headers, and request key-values promotes good organization and maintainability.
118-123: LGTM! Comprehensive value processing.The
GetInputValueListForVEProcessingmethod effectively combines all input sources into a single list for processing. The use of collection expressions (square brackets) indicates C# 12 usage, which is a modern approach.
296-348: Verify error handling for mock API responses.With the introduction of
UseRealAPI, ensure that the JSON parsing logic inParseJsonNodesToReturnParamscan handle potential differences in mock API responses:
- Mock services might return simplified JSON structures
- Response format validation might need to be adjusted
- Error messages might need to distinguish between real and mock API failures
Run this script to analyze JSON response handling across the codebase:
❌ Verification inconclusive
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for JSON response handling patterns echo "Searching for JSON response handling patterns..." rg -A 5 'JsonConvert\.DeserializeXmlNode|JToken\.Parse' # Search for WireMock response handling echo "Searching for WireMock response handling..." rg -A 5 'WireMock|Mock.*Response'Length of output: 80570
Action: Verify error handling for mock response discrepancies
The current JSON parsing in
ParseJsonNodesToReturnParamsemploys a generic try/catch mechanism (with a fallback toGeneral.CorrectJSON) without differentiating between responses from real and mock APIs. In our codebase:
- The error handling path for both legacy and current JSON parsing doesn’t include a distinct branch for mock API responses.
- Mock responses are expected to follow the standard JSON format (or be correctable via
General.CorrectJSON).It would be prudent to test the parser using typical mock API responses to confirm they conform to the expected structure. If any differences are detected, consider enhancing the error handling to provide clearer diagnostics for mock response issues.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs (2)
23-23: LGTM!The WireMock namespace is properly organized under the external integrations section.
146-153: Add unit tests for WireMock functionality.Please ensure the new WireMock-related functionality is covered by unit tests:
- Test that mappings are created when
toCreateWireMockis true- Test that mappings are not created when
toCreateWireMockis false- Test error handling during mapping creation
Let me help you verify the test coverage:
❌ Verification inconclusive
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for existing WireMock-related tests # Search for test files related to AddAPIModelWizard fd -e cs "Test.*AddAPIModelWizard.*" -x rg -l "WireMock" # Search for WireMock-related test methods rg -A 5 "public.*void.*Test.*WireMock.*\("Length of output: 101
Action Required: Add Missing Unit Tests for WireMock Functionality
Our recent search for test cases related to WireMock functionality (via searching for "WireMock" in test files and method names) returned no results. It appears that the current changes in
AddAPIModelWizard.csare not covered by any unit tests for:
- Verifying that mappings are created when
toCreateWireMockis true.- Confirming that mappings are not created when
toCreateWireMockis false.- Handling error scenarios during mapping creation.
Please add the appropriate tests to ensure this new functionality is fully covered.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs (3)
1-14: Looks good so far.The initial class structure and imports are logically organized, and the naming of the class aligns with its purpose of generating WireMock mappings.
27-28: Verify correct integration of domain and endpoint.
RemovingURLPathQuery(model.URLDomain) + TrimApiEndpointUrl(model.EndpointURL)can produce unexpected concatenations if the domain path doesn’t end with a slash. You may want to ensure a slash (or other delimiter) is inserted between the two strings to avoid malformed URLs.
94-145: Potential risk with numeric ID wildcard approach.
Regex.Replace(url, @"/\d+", "/")reduces all numeric path segments to a single slash, which might collapse multiple successive IDs. If the intent is a more precise wildcard (e.g. rewriting each numeric segment individually), the current approach could produce unexpected results. Verify if this behavior is indeed desired.Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml.cs (1)
28-34: Consider awaitingSetGridData()or handling potential exceptions.
TheSetGridData()method isasyncbut invoked without anawait. If an exception occurs during data retrieval, it won't be caught. Consider addingawaitor error handling to ensure deterministic completion and error reporting.Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs (1)
185-191: Verify exact matching ofmapping.NametoApiName.
Currently, the filtermapping.Name == ApiNamemay exclude mappings that differ in case or substring. Confirm whether an exact match is desired or if a partial/case-insensitive approach is more appropriate.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public bool UseRealAPI = true; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider making UseRealAPI a property with serialization.
The UseRealAPI field should be marked with [IsSerializedForLocalRepository] attribute to maintain consistency with other serialized members in the class. Also, consider converting it to a property to enable validation, logging, or additional logic when the value changes.
-public bool UseRealAPI = true;
+[IsSerializedForLocalRepository]
+public bool UseRealAPI { get; set; } = true;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public bool UseRealAPI = true; | |
| [IsSerializedForLocalRepository] | |
| public bool UseRealAPI { get; set; } = true; |
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| private async void xDeleteMappingBtn_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) | ||
| { | ||
| if (sender is Button button && button.DataContext is Mapping mapping) | ||
| { | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| string result = await wmController.mockAPI.DeleteStubAsync(mapping.Id); | ||
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(result)) | ||
| { | ||
| // Remove the mapping from the grid | ||
| xGridMapping.DataSourceList.Remove(mapping); | ||
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDeleteSuccess); | ||
|
|
||
| // Refresh the grid data to ensure the mappings are updated | ||
| await wmController.DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync(); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDeleteFail); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Failed to delete WireMock mapping", ex); | ||
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consolidate deletion logic to ensure consistency.
DeleteButton_Click differs from xDeleteMappingBtn_Click in success messages and subsequent actions. Consider unifying them to keep user feedback consistent and avoid code duplication.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs (1)
124-128: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Method call not awaiting the async operation.
CreateWireMockMappingsAsyncis called but not awaited, meaning the operation runs in the background and may not complete before importing models. If synchronous completion is intended, consider awaiting to ensure the mappings are finalized first.- CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(General.ConvertListToObservableList(LearnedAPIModelsList.Where(x => x.IsSelected).ToList())); + await CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(General.ConvertListToObservableList(LearnedAPIModelsList.Where(x => x.IsSelected).ToList()));Also, convert the
Finish()method topublic override async Task Finish()to accommodate awaiting.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs(5 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/UCTreeView/TreeViewItemGenericBase.cs(6 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/UCTreeView/TreeViewItemGenericBase.cs (4)
21-21: No issues with the added namespace.
Adding theAmdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.External.WireMockimport is straightforward and appears consistent with the introduced functionality.
67-67: New parameter for WireMock mapping looks good.
The additional parameterbool allowWireMockMapping = falseis clearly integrated and optional. No concerns here.
109-113: Context menu addition for WireMock is consistent.
The new menu items streamline the WireMock mapping creation. Nice addition.
236-237: Consistent integration of WireMock mapping for folder nodes.
The newallowWireMockMappingparameter and corresponding menu items mirror the approach used for item nodes, providing a uniform experience for both folders and items.Also applies to: 293-297
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs (4)
23-23: Namespace import for WireMock is appropriate.
No concerns about the added namespace reference.
33-33: New using statement for async/await is valid.
ImportingSystem.Threading.Tasksis necessary for asynchronous method support.
62-62: Follow C# naming conventions and add documentation (duplicate of a past review).
RenametoCreateWireMockto a PascalCase property and add XML documentation for clarity, as previously suggested.
148-155: Add error handling and progress reporting (duplicate of a past review).
The method lacks progress updates or error handling to inform the user if each mapping partially fails. This matches the concern from a previous review.
| @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ namespace GingerWPF.TreeViewItemsLib | |||
| { | |||
| public abstract class TreeViewItemGenericBase | |||
| { | |||
| public WireMockMappingGenerator mockMappingGenerator; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider making the field non-public and adding XML documentation.
Public fields are less common in C#: properties or private fields (with public accessors, if needed) are typically preferred. Adding XML documentation would also improve maintainability.
- public WireMockMappingGenerator mockMappingGenerator;
+ /// <summary>
+ /// Facilitates WireMock mapping generation for this tree view item.
+ /// </summary>
+ private WireMockMappingGenerator _mockMappingGenerator;
+
+ public WireMockMappingGenerator MockMappingGenerator
+ {
+ get => _mockMappingGenerator;
+ set => _mockMappingGenerator = value;
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| public WireMockMappingGenerator mockMappingGenerator; | |
| /// <summary> | |
| /// Facilitates WireMock mapping generation for this tree view item. | |
| /// </summary> | |
| private WireMockMappingGenerator _mockMappingGenerator; | |
| public WireMockMappingGenerator MockMappingGenerator | |
| { | |
| get => _mockMappingGenerator; | |
| set => _mockMappingGenerator = value; | |
| } |
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/UCTreeView/TreeViewItemGenericBase.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
|
||
| namespace GingerWPF.ApplicationModelsLib.APIModels.APIModelWizard | ||
| { | ||
| public class AddAPIModelWizard : WizardBase | ||
| { | ||
| public WireMockMappingGenerator mockMappingGenerator; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider using a property with XML documentation.
Like in other classes, a public field may reduce clarity. Converting it to a property with doc comments better aligns with C# norms.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/DocumentEditorPage.xaml.cs (1)
306-321: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRevisit Save() flow to avoid conflicting branches.
The current “else if” forisFromWireMockmight skip other saving logic if the content is also a recognized editor page. If the intention is to always sync changes to WireMock, consider relocating that code or reordering the conditions to avoid confusion and ensure consistent saving behavior.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs(6 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/DocumentEditorPage.xaml.cs(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/DocumentEditorPage.xaml.cs (2)
21-21: No concerns on the new import.
Adding theWireMockimport is straightforward and poses no immediate issues.
33-33: Async usage import confirmed.
UsingSystem.Threading.Tasksis appropriate for the newly introduced async flow.Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs (2)
21-21: New references for WireMock and async usage look fine.
They correctly support the newly introduced WireMock controller and async logic. If any of theseusingstatements become obsolete, please remove them to keep the file clean.Also applies to: 24-24, 34-34
70-71: New WireMock template page integration.
The instantiation and content assignment forwiremockTemplatePageare straightforward. Ensure the instantiated page is disposed of properly if needed, to avoid memory leaks in long-running sessions.Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs (4)
63-65: Add a descriptive label or icon for the toolbar button.
Currently, the button is created without text or an icon, which may confuse users about its purpose.- xGridMappingOutput.AddButton("", AddNewMappingAsync); + xGridMappingOutput.AddButton("Clone Mapping", AddNewMappingAsync);
80-169: Rename or clarifyAddNewMappingAsyncto reflect cloning behavior.
This method retrieves an existing stub, strips its identifiers, and creates a new mapping. The name "AddNewMapping" can be misleading if the intention is to clone an existing mapping.
171-174: Initialization of the operation DataTemplate looks good.
No issues identified; the approach of referencingxMappingOperationTabfrom resources is clean and consistent with WPF practices.
218-359: Refactor repeated logic for viewing, editing, and deleting mappings.
Similar patterns—fetching stubs, opening editor windows, and updatingDataSourceList—are replicated across these methods. Consider extracting them into shared helper methods to reduce duplication and simplify maintenance.
| public WireMockAPI mockAPI; | ||
| private bool isFromWireMock; | ||
| private string wireMockmappingId; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider restricting scope and adding properties.
Declaring mockAPI as a public field may not be ideal for encapsulation. Prefer making these fields private or using read-only properties if external access is required.
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/DocumentEditorPage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| using Amdocs.Ginger.Common; | ||
| using Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.External.WireMock; | ||
| using Amdocs.Ginger.Repository; | ||
| using Ginger.UserControls; | ||
| using Ginger.UserControlsLib.TextEditor; | ||
| using Newtonsoft.Json; | ||
| using System; | ||
| using System.IO; | ||
| using System.Linq; | ||
| using System.Text.Json; | ||
| using System.Text.Json.Nodes; | ||
| using System.Threading.Tasks; | ||
| using System.Windows; | ||
| using System.Windows.Controls; | ||
| using System.Windows.Data; | ||
| using static Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.External.WireMock.WireMockMapping; | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consolidate JSON libraries for consistency.
Currently, the code relies on both Newtonsoft.Json and System.Text.Json to handle JSON serialization. Mixing libraries increases complexity, may cause subtle serialization inconsistencies, and makes maintenance harder.
Consider standardizing on a single library (either Newtonsoft.Json or System.Text.Json) throughout the file:
-using Newtonsoft.Json;
using System.Text.Json;
using System.Text.Json.Nodes;
...
-JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Mapping>(updatedJson);
+JsonSerializer.Deserialize<Mapping>(updatedJson);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| using Amdocs.Ginger.Common; | |
| using Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.External.WireMock; | |
| using Amdocs.Ginger.Repository; | |
| using Ginger.UserControls; | |
| using Ginger.UserControlsLib.TextEditor; | |
| using Newtonsoft.Json; | |
| using System; | |
| using System.IO; | |
| using System.Linq; | |
| using System.Text.Json; | |
| using System.Text.Json.Nodes; | |
| using System.Threading.Tasks; | |
| using System.Windows; | |
| using System.Windows.Controls; | |
| using System.Windows.Data; | |
| using static Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.External.WireMock.WireMockMapping; | |
| using Amdocs.Ginger.Common; | |
| using Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.External.WireMock; | |
| using Amdocs.Ginger.Repository; | |
| using Ginger.UserControls; | |
| using Ginger.UserControlsLib.TextEditor; | |
| using System; | |
| using System.IO; | |
| using System.Linq; | |
| using System.Text.Json; | |
| using System.Text.Json.Nodes; | |
| using System.Threading.Tasks; | |
| using System.Windows; | |
| using System.Windows.Controls; | |
| using System.Windows.Data; | |
| using static Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.External.WireMock.WireMockMapping; | |
| // ... (other parts of the file) | |
| // Example of updating JSON deserialization: | |
| // - Original code: | |
| // var mapping = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Mapping>(updatedJson); | |
| // - Updated code: | |
| var mapping = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<Mapping>(updatedJson); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/UCTreeView/TreeViewItemGenericBase.cs (1)
234-295: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Refactor to avoid repeating the WireMock mapping menu logic.
The set of statements for adding the "Create WireMock Mapping" menu item at lines 291-295 duplicates the logic at lines 108-112. Consider unifying this code in a reusable method to maintain consistency and reduce duplication.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs(5 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/UCTreeView/TreeViewItemGenericBase.cs(5 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/ApplicationModelLib/ApplicationModelBase.cs(2 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (21)
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/ApplicationModelLib/ApplicationModelBase.cs (1)
19-20: LGTM!The added using directives are appropriate for accessing the Reporter class and repository functionality.
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/UCTreeView/TreeViewItemGenericBase.cs (3)
21-21: No concerns with the new using statement.
This import is necessary for WireMock-related functionality and introduces no obvious issues.
66-66: Optional parameter addition looks fine.
Allowing the caller to enable or disable WireMock mapping menu items viaallowWireMockMappingaligns well with the existing pattern of optional parameters in this method.
211-232: Validate item type to prevent InvalidCastException.
This casting approach checks only ifitemis aRepositoryItemBasebut then casts it toApplicationAPIModel. If the item is another subclass ofRepositoryItemBasenot deriving fromApplicationAPIModel, an exception will be thrown.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs (5)
13-15: Potential concurrency issues with static fields
These static members (WireMockAPIandmockConfiguration) can cause race conditions in concurrent scenarios, since multiple calls toCreateWireMockMappingmay overwrite shared state.
15-16: Unused static fieldbaseurl
baseurlis assigned on line 20 but never read afterward, making it effectively unused. Consider removing it if no longer needed.
17-17: Refine the async method signature
It is recommended to return aTaskfrom asynchronous methods rather than usingasync void, and to append "Async" to the method name per C# convention (e.g.,public static async Task CreateWireMockMappingAsync(...)).
65-87: Eliminate repeated JSON serialization logic
The code performingJsonConvert.SerializeObject(...).Replace("Content_Type", "Content-Type")and then callingWireMockAPI.CreateStubAsync(...)is repeated in eachif/else ifblock. Consider extracting this into a helper method or a single unified code path.
91-163: Consider consolidating URL-processing methods
TrimApiEndpointUrlandRemovingURLPathQueryboth handle URL parsing but in different ways. Combining them into a single robust routine can avoid duplication, unify error handling, and simplify maintenance.Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs (8)
1-16: Consolidate JSON libraries for consistency.Currently, this file references both
Newtonsoft.Json(line 6) andSystem.Text.Json(line 11) within the same flow. Mixing libraries can cause subtle serialization inconsistencies and complicates maintenance.
27-28: Encapsulate controller and model fields.Exposing
public WireMockMappingController wmController;andpublic ApplicationAPIModel mApplicationAPIModel;can lead to unintended modifications. Consider making them private/protected and providing public read-only properties if necessary.
75-85: Validate the selected item’s type more robustly.Casting
xGridMappingOutput.Grid.SelectedItemtoWireMockMapping.Mappingwithout checking its type may cause exceptions if the selected item is invalid. Perform a stronger type check for safety.
87-173: Refactor repeated JSON editing window code.Both
AddNewMappingAsyncandxEditMappingbtn_Clickcreate a local WPF window with aTextBoxfor editing JSON. Extracting this logic into a shared helper method or dedicated user control would reduce code duplication and simplify maintenance.Also applies to: 260-339
92-92: Ensure valid mapping ID before calling GetStubAsync.When
mapList.FirstOrDefault()is null, passing a null ID tomockAPI.GetStubAsyncmay result in an error. Verify that a valid mapping ID is available before making the call.
186-198: Consider case-insensitive matching for mapping names.Using
mapping.Name == ApiNamemay miss valid matches if only case differs. Evaluate whether a case-insensitive comparison is desired (e.g.,StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase).
200-222: Allow users to specify the output path for downloaded mappings.Hard-coding
"WireMockAPI_mappings.json"can be restrictive. Offering a dialog or configurable option for the file path/filename can enhance usability.
224-258: Refactor repeated logic for viewing, editing, and deleting mappings.Similar design patterns—fetching stubs, opening editor windows, and updating
xGridMappingOutput.DataSourceList—recur acrossxViewMappingbtn_Click,xEditMappingbtn_Click, andxDeleteMappingBtn_Click. Moving these tasks into shared helper methods would simplify the code and reduce duplication.Also applies to: 260-339, 341-366
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs (4)
23-23: LGTM!The new using directives are correctly placed and necessary for WireMock functionality and async operations.
Also applies to: 33-33
61-61: Follow C# naming conventions and add documentation.The public field should follow C# naming conventions and include XML documentation for better maintainability.
Apply this diff:
- public bool toCreateWireMock; + /// <summary> + /// Gets or sets a value indicating whether WireMock mappings should be created during the finish process. + /// </summary> + public bool ToCreateWireMock { get; set; }
123-127: Improve code reusability and async handling.The code has the following issues:
- The LINQ query
LearnedAPIModelsList.Where(x => x.IsSelected)is duplicated.- The method name suggests async operation but is called synchronously.
Apply this diff to improve code reusability and async handling:
+ var selectedModels = General.ConvertListToObservableList(LearnedAPIModelsList.Where(x => x.IsSelected).ToList()); if (toCreateWireMock) { - CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(General.ConvertListToObservableList(LearnedAPIModelsList.Where(x => x.IsSelected).ToList())); + await CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(selectedModels); } - ImportAPIModels(General.ConvertListToObservableList(LearnedAPIModelsList.Where(x => x.IsSelected == true).ToList())); + ImportAPIModels(selectedModels);Also update the method signature to be async:
- public override void Finish() + public override async Task Finish()
147-153: Add error handling and progress reporting.The method should handle errors and report progress for better reliability and user experience.
Apply this diff:
- private async Task CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(ObservableList<ApplicationAPIModel> SelectedAAMList) + private async Task CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(ObservableList<ApplicationAPIModel> selectedModels) { - - foreach (ApplicationAPIModel appmodel in SelectedAAMList) + var total = selectedModels.Count; + var current = 0; + + foreach (var model in selectedModels) { - WireMockMappingGenerator.CreateWireMockMapping(appmodel); + try + { + await WireMockMappingGenerator.CreateWireMockMapping(model); + current++; + OnPropertyChanged(nameof(Progress)); // Assuming WizardBase has progress reporting + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticErrorMessage, + $"Failed to create WireMock mapping for {model.Name}: {ex.Message}"); + } } }
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/ApplicationModelLib/ApplicationModelBase.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Actions/Webservices/ActWebAPIBase.cs (2)
341-344: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Improve error handling in JSON parsing.
The catch block silently swallows exceptions and attempts to correct JSON. Consider logging the original exception for debugging purposes before attempting to correct the JSON.
try { mAct.ParseJSONToOutputValues(ResponseMessage, 1); } - catch + catch (Exception ex) { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, $"Failed to parse JSON response. Attempting correction. Error: {ex.Message}"); mAct.ParseJSONToOutputValues(General.CorrectJSON(ResponseMessage), 1); }
287-290: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Improve error handling in XML parsing.
The catch block silently swallows exceptions. Consider logging the exception for debugging purposes.
} - catch + catch (Exception ex) { + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.DEBUG, $"Failed to parse XML response: {ex.Message}"); return false; }
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs (2)
127-132: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove code reusability and async handling.
The code has the following issues:
- The LINQ query
LearnedAPIModelsList.Where(x => x.IsSelected)is duplicated.- The method name suggests async operation but is called synchronously.
151-157: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueFix async/await usage in CreateWireMockMappingsAsync.
The method is marked as async but doesn't use await, which defeats the purpose of async/await and may lead to unexpected behavior.
Apply this diff:
- private async Task CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(ObservableList<ApplicationAPIModel> SelectedAAMList) + private async Task CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(ObservableList<ApplicationAPIModel> selectedModels) { - foreach (ApplicationAPIModel appmodel in SelectedAAMList) + foreach (var model in selectedModels) { - WireMockMappingGenerator.CreateWireMockMapping(appmodel); + await Task.Run(() => WireMockMappingGenerator.CreateWireMockMapping(model)); } }Add error handling and progress reporting.
Verify WireMock server configuration.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockAPI.cs (1)
30-186: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRefactor repeated HTTP request logic.
Many methods create and dispose separate HttpClient instances with similar structures. Consider introducing a base method or shared HttpClient instance.
+ private readonly HttpClient _httpClient; + + public WireMockAPI() + { + _httpClient = new HttpClient { Timeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30) }; + // ... rest of constructor + } + + private async Task<T> ExecuteRequestAsync<T>(Func<HttpClient, Task<HttpResponseMessage>> request, string errorMessage) + { + try + { + var response = await request(_httpClient); + response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); + if (typeof(T) == typeof(HttpResponseMessage)) + return (T)(object)response; + return (T)(object)await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync(); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError); + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, errorMessage, ex); + return default; + } + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs(6 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs(2 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs(5 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/DocumentEditorPage.xaml.cs(5 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Actions/Webservices/ActWebAPIBase.cs(2 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockAPI.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (27)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs (2)
23-23: LGTM!The added using directives are necessary for WireMock integration and async/await support.
Also applies to: 33-33
62-65: LGTM!The property follows C# naming conventions and includes XML documentation for better maintainability.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml (2)
1-9: LGTM! Page declaration follows best practices.The page declaration includes all necessary namespaces and appropriate design-time dimensions.
47-57: Use consistent terminology for deletion tooltip.The button's tooltip says "Deleting Mapping." Consider changing it to "Delete Mapping" to align with the "View Mapping" and "Edit Mapping" labels and provide consistency in the UI.
- ToolTip="Deleting Mapping" + ToolTip="Delete Mapping"Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs (1)
21-21: LGTM!The import statement is correctly placed and necessary for accessing the WireMockConfiguration class.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs (7)
6-13: Consolidate JSON libraries for consistency.
The file uses bothNewtonsoft.Json(line 6) andSystem.Text.Json(lines 12-13). Relying on multiple JSON libraries can cause inconsistencies and increase maintenance complexity.
28-29: Encapsulate public fields.
MarkingwmControllerandmApplicationAPIModelaspublicmakes them more susceptible to unintended modifications. Consider changing them toprivateorprotectedand providing safe public accessors or properties if needed.
117-203: Refactor repeated JSON editing window code.
The logic for displaying an editable JSON window here is similar to the code inxEditMappingbtn_Click. Extracting this into a helper method or separate user control would reduce duplication and simplify maintenance.
227-227: Consider case-insensitive matching for mapping names.
Currently,mapping.Name == ApiNameis a strict comparison. Evaluate whether a case-insensitive comparison is preferable to avoid missing matches that differ only by case.
243-244: Allow users to specify the output path for downloaded mappings.
The mapping JSON is saved to a hard-coded file name"WireMockAPI_mappings.json". Consider providing an option for the user to choose a location and filename.
254-288: Refactor repeated JSON editing window code.
Much of this window setup and JSON-loading logic appears similar to the code inAddNewMappingAsync. Factor it out into a shared method to reduce duplication.
371-398: Refactor repeated logic for viewing, editing, and deleting mappings.
The methods for these operations share similar patterns in retrieving, parsing, and updating mappings. Abstracting the common functionality would make the code more maintainable.Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/DocumentEditorPage.xaml.cs (5)
21-21: No issues with adding this import.
It is necessary for referencing the WireMockAPI class.
33-33: Async support import looks good.
This import is required for the new async method in this file.
44-46: Good practice making these fields private.
This addresses past concerns about encapsulation. If external access is needed in the future, consider using properties.
48-48: Revisit constructor-based instantiation for maintainability.
CreatingWireMockAPIdirectly in the constructor can reduce testability and flexibility. Consider injectingWireMockAPIor using a factory method for better maintainability.
306-306: Async method signature is appropriate.
Switching toasync Task Save()makes sense for asynchronous operations. Make sure callers handle potential exceptions or implement proper awaiting so that errors aren’t silently lost.Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Actions/Webservices/ActWebAPIBase.cs (1)
100-100:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify .NET version compatibility for collection expressions.
The code uses collection expressions (e.g.,
[]syntax), which is a C# 12 feature. Ensure that the project targets a compatible .NET version (e.g., .NET 8) to avoid compilation issues.Also applies to: 103-103, 106-106, 111-111, 121-121, 271-271, 328-328
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check .NET SDK version and project target framework # Find all .csproj files fd -e csproj # Check SDK version and target framework in project files fd -e csproj -x cat {} \; | grep -E "TargetFramework|LangVersion"Length of output: 3171
Ensure .NET Version Compatibility for C# 12 Collection Expressions
The usage of collection expressions (the
[]syntax) in ActWebAPIBase.cs (at line 100, and similarly in other locations) relies on C# 12 features. The recent scan shows that while several projects in the solution target .NET 8 (which supports these features), some projects remain on netstandard2.0. Please verify that the GingerCoreCommon project—specifically the Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/GingerCoreCommon.csproj—and its associated test projects are updated to target a framework that supports C# 12 (e.g., .NET 8) to avoid potential compilation issues.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs (5)
13-15: Consider thread-safety for shared static fields.
WireMockAPI,mockConfiguration, andbaseurlare all declared as static and could be accessed concurrently. If multiple calls toCreateWireMockMappinghappen in parallel, their values may become inconsistent, especially formockConfigurationorbaseurl. If parallel usage is expected, consider using an instance-based approach or appropriate synchronization.
15-15: Remove or utilize_baseurlfield if not needed.
baseurlis assigned on line 20 but never referenced elsewhere. If it’s truly unnecessary, removing it helps keep the code clean.
16-16: Rename the async method for clarity.Conventionally, async methods returning
Taskshould end withAsyncand returnTask, notvoid. This helps communicate asynchronous behavior (e.g.,CreateWireMockMappingAsync).
65-87: Eliminate commented-out stubs and unify stub creation logic.You have multiple commented-out blocks that each call
WireMockAPI.CreateStubAsyncsimilarly. Since line 89 already covers the implementation, remove commented-out and duplicated code to keep the logic DRY and easier to maintain.Also applies to: 88-89
92-143: Consolidate or unify URL-parsing methods.
TrimApiEndpointUrlandRemovingURLPathQueryhandle URL processing differently. If possible, consider refactoring into a single robust routine to maintain consistency and reduce possible errors or duplication.Also applies to: 151-165
Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml.cs (2)
79-82: Add a fallback or null-check for resource retrieval.
CreateOperationTemplaterelies onxMappingWindowPage.Resources["xMappingOperationTab"]. If the resource is missing or renamed, this could throw an exception. A null check or fallback ensures robust error handling.
185-218: Consider gracefully handling empty mappings refresh.Upon downloading or viewing mappings, you handle success/failure. If the returned mappings are empty or invalid, consider uniform fallback logic (e.g., user notifications, disabled UI operations) to avoid inconsistent states.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs (1)
69-71: Ensure consistent user experience across new frames.
WireMockTemplatePageis loaded intoxWireMockTemplateFrame. Confirm the user’s transitions between tabs or frames remain intuitive, especially when toggling WireMock vs. real API modes.Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml (1)
64-64: Verify grid configuration.The ucGrid has ShowAdd, ShowDelete, ShowEdit collapsed but ShowRefresh visible. Ensure this aligns with the intended functionality since the DataTemplate includes Edit and Delete buttons.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/DocumentEditorPage.xaml.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs (2)
28-29: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Restrict field accessibility.
public WireMockMappingController wmController;andpublic ApplicationAPIModel mApplicationAPIModel;could be private with public getters if you don’t require direct assignment outside this class.
237-258: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider allowing the user to specify the download path for mappings.
You are hard-coding"WireMockAPI_mappings.json". Offering a file dialog or configuration setting would be more flexible and align with user expectations.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/ReporterLib/UserMsgsPool.cs(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml.cs (2)
79-82: Check for missing resources or renamed keys inCreateOperationTemplate.
If"xMappingOperationTab"is absent or renamed in.Resources, this line may throw an exception. You may want to add a null check or fallback to handle this scenario.
84-94: Consider centralizing window display logic.
ShowAsWindowsets up custom buttons, loader elements, and styling. If similar code appears in other pages, refactor it into a shared helper or base class to ensure consistency and eliminate duplication.Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs (1)
302-363: Refactor repeated JSON editing window code.
Similarly to the “Add New Mapping” flow, this code snippet duplicates JSON input and button creation for editing stubs. Move repeated logic to a shared function for improved maintainability and consistency.
| List<Mapping> mapList = await GetMatchingMapping(); | ||
| string mappingJson = await wmController.mockAPI.GetStubAsync(mapList.FirstOrDefault()?.Id); | ||
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(mappingJson)) | ||
| { | ||
|
|
||
| var jsonObject = JsonNode.Parse(mappingJson); | ||
| // Remove "id" and "uuid" if they exist | ||
| jsonObject!.AsObject().Remove("id"); | ||
| jsonObject.AsObject().Remove("uuid"); | ||
|
|
||
| // Convert back to JSON string | ||
| string formattedJson = jsonObject.ToJsonString(new JsonSerializerOptions { WriteIndented = true }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Create a new window to display and edit the JSON | ||
| Window jsonWindow = new Window | ||
| { | ||
| Title = "Edit WireMock Mapping", | ||
| Width = 600, | ||
| Height = 400 | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| TextBox jsonTextBox = new TextBox | ||
| { | ||
| Text = formattedJson, | ||
| IsReadOnly = false, | ||
| TextWrapping = TextWrapping.Wrap, | ||
| VerticalScrollBarVisibility = ScrollBarVisibility.Auto, | ||
| HorizontalScrollBarVisibility = ScrollBarVisibility.Auto, | ||
| AcceptsReturn = true | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| Button updateButton = new Button | ||
| { | ||
| Content = "Add", | ||
| Width = 100, | ||
| Height = 30, | ||
| Margin = new Thickness(10) | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| updateButton.Click += async (_, args) => | ||
| { | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| string updatedJson = jsonTextBox.Text; | ||
| string result = await wmController.mockAPI.CreateStubAsync(updatedJson); | ||
| if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(result)) | ||
| { | ||
| // Update the mapping in the grid | ||
| xGridMappingOutput.DataSourceList.Add(JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<Mapping>(result)); | ||
| jsonWindow.Close(); | ||
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingUpdateSuccess); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingUpdateFail); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Failed to update WireMock mapping", ex); | ||
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| StackPanel panel = new StackPanel(); | ||
| panel.Children.Add(jsonTextBox); | ||
| panel.Children.Add(updateButton); | ||
|
|
||
| jsonWindow.Content = panel; | ||
| jsonWindow.ShowDialog(); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Failed to edit WireMock mapping", ex); | ||
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Factor out repeated JSON window creation for new mapping.
This flow closely mirrors the editing logic but differs slightly (e.g., button text and operation call). Extracting the shared functionality into a reusable helper method or user control will reduce duplication and make future enhancements easier.
| if (sender is Button button && button.DataContext is Mapping mapping) | ||
| { | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| HttpResponseMessage result = await wmController.mockAPI.DeleteStubAsync(mapping.Id); | ||
| if (result.IsSuccessStatusCode) | ||
| { | ||
| // Remove the mapping from the grid | ||
| xGridMappingOutput.DataSourceList.Remove(mapping); | ||
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDeleteSuccess); | ||
|
|
||
| // Refresh the grid data to ensure the mappings are updated | ||
| await wmController.DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync(); | ||
| } | ||
| else | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockMappingDeleteFail); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| catch (Exception ex) | ||
| { | ||
| Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.ERROR, "Failed to delete WireMock mapping", ex); | ||
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Ensure grid refresh after deleting a single mapping.
Similar to the logic in DeleteAllButton_Click, you may want to call SetGridData() or reassign DataSourceList after a single stub deletion, ensuring the displayed dataset remains aligned with the server state.
| private async void AddNewMappingAsync(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) | ||
| { | ||
| try | ||
| { | ||
| List<Mapping> mapList = await GetMatchingMapping(); | ||
| string mappingJson = await wmController.mockAPI.GetStubAsync(mapList.FirstOrDefault()?.Id); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Validate mapping list before accessing .FirstOrDefault().
When you call mapList.FirstOrDefault()?.Id, the list may be empty, resulting in a null ID passed into GetStubAsync. Add a check for an empty list to avoid any unintended behavior or errors.
+ if (mapList == null || mapList.Count == 0)
+ {
+ Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError);
+ return;
+ }
string mappingJson = await wmController.mockAPI.GetStubAsync(mapList.FirstOrDefault()?.Id);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| private async void AddNewMappingAsync(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) | |
| { | |
| try | |
| { | |
| List<Mapping> mapList = await GetMatchingMapping(); | |
| string mappingJson = await wmController.mockAPI.GetStubAsync(mapList.FirstOrDefault()?.Id); | |
| private async void AddNewMappingAsync(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) | |
| { | |
| try | |
| { | |
| List<Mapping> mapList = await GetMatchingMapping(); | |
| if (mapList == null || mapList.Count == 0) | |
| { | |
| Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockAPIError); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| string mappingJson = await wmController.mockAPI.GetStubAsync(mapList.FirstOrDefault()?.Id); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs(2 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs (5)
14-16: Potential concurrency issues with static fields.Because
WireMockAPI,mockConfiguration, andbaseurlare all defined asstaticand shared, multiple concurrent calls toCreateWireMockMappingcould overwrite each other’s state. Please consider using either instance-based members or thread-safe synchronization if parallel usage is anticipated.
16-16: Remove or use the unused static fieldbaseurl.This field is assigned at line 21 but never invoked. If it is no longer needed, please remove it and any related references to keep the code clean.
17-17: Refine async method naming to follow .NET conventions.In C#, it’s standard to place
asyncafterstaticand to append “Async” at the end of an async method’s name. Consider the following adjustment:-public async static Task CreateWireMockMapping(ApplicationAPIModel model) +public static async Task CreateWireMockMappingAsync(ApplicationAPIModel model)
20-20: Verify correct concatenation of domain and endpoint.The concatenation of
model.URLDomainandmodel.EndpointURLwith a simple+could lead to issues if the domain does not end with a slash. Please confirm that the resulting URL string is valid (e.g., “https://example.com/api”) or consider automatically inserting a slash if needed.
70-142: Unify URL parsing and trimming logic.
TrimApiEndpointUrlandRemovingURLPathQueryboth handle URL processing. Consider merging them into a single, comprehensive function or at least sharing core routines to maintain consistent error handling and reduce duplication.Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs (2)
128-128: No functional concerns detected here.
This newly added sub-menu item for converting web service actions seems fine. It’s a short, self-contained addition that follows the existing pattern for adding menu items.
140-140: Confirm usage of the newallowWireMockMappingparameter.
Ensure that any logic tied toallowWireMockMappingis implemented and tested in the consuming method(s). Keep an eye out for unintended side effects, such as showing or hiding relevant WireMock options in other parts of the application.
...inger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...inger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...inger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs (1)
44-44: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider lazy initialization for
wmController.
According to the retrieved learnings,wmControlleris used only in specific scenarios and should be instantiated on-demand rather than at class construction. This can improve performance and reduce unnecessary overhead.Below is a diff proposing the removal of direct instantiation and adding a null check in
WireMockTemplateTabCount:- private WireMockMappingController wmController = new(); + private WireMockMappingController wmController; public async Task<int> WireMockTemplateTabCount() { + if (wmController == null) + { + wmController = new WireMockMappingController(); + } try { var mappings = await wmController.DeserializeWireMockResponseAsync(); ... } ... }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs (1)
Learnt from: AmanPrasad43
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#4100
File: Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs:44-44
Timestamp: 2025-02-13T11:58:42.226Z
Learning: In the APIModelPage class, WireMockMappingController (wmController) should be lazily initialized when needed rather than at construction time, as its usage is limited to specific scenarios.
🔇 Additional comments (10)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs (10)
21-21: Import looks good.
No concerns with adding theAmdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.External.WireMocknamespace.
24-24: Import statement confirmed.
No issues with addingGinger.ApplicationModelsLib.WireMockAPIModels.
34-34: ImportingSystem.Threading.Tasksis fine.
This is necessary for async/await usage.
69-70: New WireMockTemplatePage instantiation.
These lines cleanly set up the WireMock template page and integrate it into the UI.
200-212: Asynchronous update of the WireMock template tab header.
This implementation includes exception handling and logging. It looks robust for updating the tab text asynchronously.
214-232: Method for retrieving WireMock mapping count.
The code properly awaitsDeserializeWireMockResponseAsyncand filters results by API name, returning 0 on failure. This is a clear and effective approach.
1033-1036: Event handler for real API radio button.
This straightforwardly setsUseRealAPIto true. No issues identified.
1039-1041: Event handler for mock API radio button.
Similarly setsUseRealAPIto false. Straightforward and consistent.
1043-1048: CheckRealAPIRadioButton method.
Programmatically re-checks the "Real API" radio button and calls its event handler. Works as intended, but be aware of repeated UI logic in event callbacks.
1050-1055: CheckMockAPIRadioButton method.
Sets the "Mock API" radio button and triggers its event handler. Matches the real API method, maintaining consistent pattern usage.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...inger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...inger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
♻️ Duplicate comments (10)
Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs (1)
166-191: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove URL mode handlers.
The current implementation has several issues:
- Duplicate logic between mock and real API handlers
- Inefficient creation of new APIModelPage instances for each model
- Direct event handler calls could lead to side effects
Consider this improved implementation:
+ private void UpdateAPIMode(bool useMock, object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) + { + Dictionary<ApplicationAPIModel, APIModelPage> pageCache = new Dictionary<ApplicationAPIModel, APIModelPage>(); + try + { + foreach (ApplicationAPIModel apiModel in mAPIModelFolder.GetFolderItems()) + { + // Reuse existing page or create new one + if (!pageCache.TryGetValue(apiModel, out APIModelPage apiModelPage)) + { + apiModelPage = new APIModelPage(apiModel); + pageCache[apiModel] = apiModelPage; + } + + // Update radio button state + if (useMock) + { + if (!apiModelPage.xMockAPIRadioButton.IsChecked == true) + { + apiModelPage.CheckMockAPIRadioButton(); + apiModelPage.xMockAPIRadioButton_Checked(sender, e); + } + } + else + { + if (!apiModelPage.xRealAPIRadioButton.IsChecked == true) + { + apiModelPage.CheckRealAPIRadioButton(); + apiModelPage.xRealAPIRadioButton_Checked(sender, e); + } + } + } + } + finally + { + // Clean up + pageCache.Clear(); + } + } + - private void UseMockedAPIURL(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) + private void UseMockedAPIURL(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) - { - foreach (ApplicationAPIModel apiModel in mAPIModelFolder.GetFolderItems()) - { - APIModelPage apiModelPage = new APIModelPage(apiModel); - - if (apiModelPage.xMockAPIRadioButton.IsChecked != true) - { - apiModelPage.CheckMockAPIRadioButton(); - } - apiModelPage.xMockAPIRadioButton_Checked(this, e); - } - } + { + UpdateAPIMode(true, sender, e); + } - private void UseRealAPIURL(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) + private void UseRealAPIURL(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) - { - foreach (ApplicationAPIModel apiModel in mAPIModelFolder.GetFolderItems()) - { - APIModelPage apiModelPage = new APIModelPage(apiModel); - if (apiModelPage.xRealAPIRadioButton.IsChecked != true) - { - apiModelPage.CheckRealAPIRadioButton(); - } - apiModelPage.xRealAPIRadioButton_Checked(this, e); - } - } + { + UpdateAPIMode(false, sender, e); + }This refactored version:
- Consolidates duplicate logic into a single method
- Caches APIModelPage instances for reuse
- Only updates state when necessary
- Properly cleans up resources
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs (1)
88-100: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd null checks and error handling for toggle action.
When checking theWireMockUrl, consider handling toggles and exceptions similarly to how other reviewers suggested in the past (try-catch, toggling state off if setup fails, etc.). Right now, ifWireMockUrlis empty, you display a message but do not reset the toggle. That could confuse users.private void xWireMockMappingToggle_Checked(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e) { + if (!(sender is System.Windows.Controls.Primitives.ToggleButton toggle)) + { + return; + } WireMockConfiguration mockConfiguration = ... if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(mockConfiguration.WireMockUrl)) { Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.WireMockConnectionFail); + toggle.IsChecked = false; } else { AddAPIModelWizard.ToCreateWireMock = true; } }Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockAPI.cs (3)
26-41: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Favor a shared
HttpClientor dedicated helper method.
Repeatedly instantiatingHttpClientcan negatively impact performance and lead to port exhaustion under heavy usage. Consider using a single, long-livedHttpClientor a helper method that manages requests and disposes properly if needed.public async Task<bool> TestWireMockConnectionAsync(string url) { try { - using (HttpClient client = new HttpClient()) - { - HttpResponseMessage response = await client.GetAsync(url); - return response.IsSuccessStatusCode; - } + HttpResponseMessage response = await SharedHttpClient.GetAsync(url); + return response.IsSuccessStatusCode; } catch (Exception ex) { ... } }
170-188: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Unify return types for delete methods.
DeleteStubAsyncandDeleteAllMappingsAsyncare returningHttpResponseMessageinstead of a simpler return type (e.g.,bool,string). This approach can be inconsistent with other methods returning status or strings. Consider returning a more uniform result and handling disposal internally.-public async Task<HttpResponseMessage> DeleteStubAsync(string stubId) +public async Task<bool> DeleteStubAsync(string stubId) { try { ... - return response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); + response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode(); + return true; } ... - return null; + return false; }
19-23: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Validate the
WireMockUrlin the constructor.
IfWireMockConfiguration.WireMockUrlis null or empty, subsequent requests will fail. Consider throwing an exception or logging a warning here to proactively indicate misconfiguration.public WireMockAPI() { mockConfiguration = ... _baseUrl = mockConfiguration.WireMockUrl; + if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(_baseUrl)) + { + throw new ArgumentException("WireMockUrl cannot be null or empty"); + } }Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs (1)
44-44: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Favor lazy initialization.
According to your own note (retrieved learnings),WireMockMappingControllerusage is quite limited. Consider initializingwmControlleronly when needed rather than instantiating it at construction time, to improve performance and reduce unnecessary dependencies.Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml (3)
14-14: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Consider using a more descriptive resource key name.
The resource key
@ActionButtonPaddingcould be more specific to its usage context.- x:Key="@ActionButtonPadding" + x:Key="@MappingActionButtonPadding"
47-58: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use consistent terminology for deletion tooltip.
The button's tooltip says "Deleting Mapping" while other buttons use "View Mapping" and "Edit Mapping".
- ToolTip="Deleting Mapping" + ToolTip="Delete Mapping"
53-56: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use consistent icon sizes across action buttons.
The delete button uses a 32x32 icon while view and edit buttons use 16x16 icons.
- Source="{StaticResource @Delete_32x32}" + Source="{StaticResource @Delete_16x16}"Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/WebServicesDriver/HttpWebClientUtils.cs (1)
853-865: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Document content types and use constants.
Content types should be documented and defined as constants for better maintainability.
+ /// <summary> + /// Content type constants for HTTP requests. + /// </summary> + private static class ContentTypes + { + public const string TextPlain = "text/plain; charset=utf-8"; + public const string Xml = "application/xml"; + public const string JsonWithoutCharset = "application/json"; + public const string Pdf = "application/pdf"; + } case ApplicationAPIUtils.eRequestContentType.TextPlain: - return "text/plain; charset=utf-8"; + return ContentTypes.TextPlain; case ApplicationAPIUtils.eRequestContentType.XML: - return "application/xml"; + return ContentTypes.Xml; case ApplicationAPIUtils.eRequestContentType.JSonWithoutCharset: - return "application/json"; + return ContentTypes.JsonWithoutCharset; case ApplicationAPIUtils.eRequestContentType.PDF: - return "application/pdf"; + return ContentTypes.Pdf;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml(3 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs(6 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs(3 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs(2 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/DocumentEditorPage.xaml.cs(5 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Actions/Webservices/ActWebAPIBase.cs(2 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/ReporterLib/UserMsgsPool.cs(3 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/ApplicationModelLib/APIModelLib/ApplicationAPIModel.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/ActionsLib/Webservices/ActWebAPIModelOperation.cs(3 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/WebServicesDriver/HttpWebClientUtils.cs(5 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockAPI.cs(1 hunks)Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (5)
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/WebServicesDriver/HttpWebClientUtils.cs (1)
Learnt from: AmanPrasad43
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#4100
File: Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/WebServicesDriver/HttpWebClientUtils.cs:353-364
Timestamp: 2025-02-14T06:06:06.322Z
Learning: WireMockConfiguration always stores URLs with __admin suffix through URL normalization, so additional checks for __admin presence are not needed when using WireMockUrl.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs (1)
Learnt from: AmanPrasad43
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#4100
File: Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs:44-44
Timestamp: 2025-02-13T11:58:42.226Z
Learning: In the APIModelPage class, WireMockMappingController (wmController) should be lazily initialized when needed rather than at construction time, as its usage is limited to specific scenarios.
Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs (2)
Learnt from: AmanPrasad43
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#4100
File: Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs:151-157
Timestamp: 2025-02-14T05:46:45.210Z
Learning: WireMock server configuration validation is handled internally by WireMockMappingGenerator when creating mappings, which includes URL validation and error handling.
Learnt from: AmanPrasad43
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#4100
File: Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs:66-66
Timestamp: 2025-02-14T06:12:43.975Z
Learning: In WireMockMappingGenerator, Content_Type is intentionally used in the stub template and replaced with Content-Type after JSON serialization, as per the team's design choice.
Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml.cs (1)
Learnt from: AmanPrasad43
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#4100
File: Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs:44-44
Timestamp: 2025-02-13T11:58:42.226Z
Learning: In the APIModelPage class, WireMockMappingController (wmController) should be lazily initialized when needed rather than at construction time, as its usage is limited to specific scenarios.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs (1)
Learnt from: AmanPrasad43
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#4100
File: Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs:44-44
Timestamp: 2025-02-13T11:58:42.226Z
Learning: In the APIModelPage class, WireMockMappingController (wmController) should be lazily initialized when needed rather than at construction time, as its usage is limited to specific scenarios.
🔇 Additional comments (26)
Ginger/Ginger/UserControlsLib/TextEditor/DocumentEditorPage.xaml.cs (3)
21-21: Imports approved.
No issues found with introducing WireMock and Task references.Also applies to: 33-33
48-48: Extended constructor appears fine.
Appending parameters with default values avoids breaking existing calls.
313-313: Verify asynchronous usage.
Ensure that all calling code properly awaits this async method to avoid unexpected behavior.Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs (1)
140-140: LGTM!The addition of
allowWireMockMappingparameter for non-root folders is appropriate.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/External/WireMock/WireMockMappingGenerator.cs (5)
14-16: Potential concurrency issues with static fields.
BecauseWireMockAPI,mockConfiguration, andbaseurlare all declared as static, multiple concurrent calls toCreateWireMockMappingcould overwrite each other’s states. Consider using instance-based members or thread-safe synchronization if parallel usage is expected.
17-17: Refine naming of the async method.
In C#, it is a common convention to end asynchronous method names with “Async”. This practice helps convey that the method is asynchronous.- public static async Task CreateWireMockMapping(ApplicationAPIModel model) + public static async Task CreateWireMockMappingAsync(ApplicationAPIModel model)
66-66: Avoid manual string replacements for headers.
Replacing"Content_Type"with"Content-Type"post-serialization can be brittle. However, as per previous discussions and learnings, this is an intentional design choice.
70-142: Consider consolidating URL-processing methods.
BothTrimApiEndpointUrlandRemovingURLPathQueryparse or sanitize parts of the URL in different ways. Combining them into one robust utility may reduce complexity, duplication, and the risk of inconsistent behavior or error handling.
12-146: Add or extend unit test coverage for WireMock mapping logic.
This class introduces core mapping functionality for WireMock, but no unit tests are currently shown for verifying the mappings’ correctness. Please consider adding tests to ensure that the logic works as intended and to catch potential regressions.Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs (1)
21-28: Imports look good but check usage.
The newly added imports appear consistent with the introduced functionality. However, confirm that all imported namespaces (e.g.,Amdocs.Ginger.Common.External.Configurations,Amdocs.Ginger.CoreNET.External.WireMock,System.Threading.Tasks) are actually used within this file to avoid accumulating unused references.Ginger/Ginger/GeneralWindows/WireMockMappingPage.xaml.cs (1)
136-153: Handle potential server downtime inSetGridData.
IfDeserializeWireMockResponseAsyncfails due to server unavailability, you might receivenull. Verify thatxGridMapping.DataSourceList = ...handlesnullsafely or add a quick check to avoid exceptions.Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml.cs (4)
28-29: Encapsulate controller and model fields.
These fields are declared as public, potentially allowing unintended external modifications. Please convert them to private (or protected) and expose them via properties if necessary.
6-6: Consolidate JSON libraries for consistency.
You are referencing bothNewtonsoft.JsonandSystem.Text.Json. Adopting a single library can simplify serialization logic and reduce maintenance overhead.Also applies to: 11-13
231-234: Consider case-insensitive matching for API names.
Right now, filtering is done withmapping.Name == ApiName. If your API names sometimes differ in letter-case, you might want to do a case-insensitive comparison to avoid missing legitimate matches.
123-208: Refactor repeated JSON editing logic.
BothAddNewMappingAsync(lines 123-208) andxEditMappingbtn_Click(lines 296-375) create a local WPF window with aTextBoxfor editing JSON. Extract that into a shared method or user control to avoid duplication and improve maintainability.Also applies to: 296-375
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml.cs (2)
200-212: Good use of try/catch when updating the tab header.
Thank you for handling exceptions gracefully. This prevents unexpected crashes ifWireMockTemplateTabCount()fails.
214-232: Consider case-insensitivity for mapping lookups.
If you allow variants in naming, an exact string comparisonmapping.Name == ApiNamemay skip valid matches. Decide whether case-insensitive matching suits your scenario.Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/WireMockAPIModels/WireMockTemplatePage.xaml (1)
63-63: LGTM! Grid configuration looks good.The ucGrid control is properly configured with appropriate visibility settings for various features.
Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Repository/ApplicationModelLib/APIModelLib/ApplicationAPIModel.cs (1)
41-43: LGTM! Property implementation follows class patterns.The
UseLiveAPIproperty is well-implemented with proper backing field, serialization attribute, and property change notification.Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/Actions/Webservices/ActWebAPIBase.cs (1)
96-97: LGTM! Property implementation is clean and consistent.The
UseLiveAPIproperty is well-implemented with proper serialization attribute and default value.Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelPage.xaml (3)
53-53: LGTM!The height increase accommodates the new API mode controls while maintaining proper layout.
63-67: LGTM!The API mode selection controls are well-structured with appropriate defaults and event handlers.
274-282:✅ Verification successful
Verify the WireMock logo image path.
Please ensure that the image file exists at the specified path:
/Images/WireMock_Logo.png.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the WireMock logo image exists. fd -t f "WireMock_Logo.png"Length of output: 66
Image path verified: WireMock logo file exists
The image file was found at "Ginger/Ginger/Images/WireMock_Logo.png". This confirms that the specified source path (
/Images/WireMock_Logo.png) in the XAML file aligns with the project’s structure (assuming "Ginger/Ginger" is treated as the project root). Please ensure that the build settings (e.g., resource build actions) correctly incorporate files from this directory so that the image renders properly at runtime.Ginger/GingerCoreNET/Drivers/WebServicesDriver/HttpWebClientUtils.cs (1)
353-364: LGTM!The mock URL handling is correct. The code safely manipulates the URL by removing the
__adminsuffix, which is always present inWireMockUrlthrough URL normalization.Ginger/GingerCoreCommon/ReporterLib/UserMsgsPool.cs (2)
177-187: LGTM! Well-structured enum additions.The new WireMock related enum values are logically grouped together and follow consistent naming conventions.
22-23:✅ Verification successful
Verify necessity of added using directives.
The newly added using directives
SystemandSystem.Collections.Genericmay be redundant since they are commonly included by default or through other references.Let's check if these imports are actually needed:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if these imports are used directly in the file # and not already imported through other references rg -A 5 "using System;" rg -A 5 "using System.Collections.Generic;"Length of output: 66079
Review Confirmation: Using Directives in UserMsgsPool.cs
After reviewing the codebase, the search results confirm that both the
using System;andusing System.Collections.Generic;directives are widely used across the repository. Given that this file likely employs fundamental system types and generic collections (common in messaging and reporting code), their inclusion inGinger/GingerCoreCommon/ReporterLib/UserMsgsPool.csis justified.There is no indication that these directives are redundant—if they were unused in this file, a removal might be warranted, but consistency with similar files and the expected usage of these namespaces supports keeping them.
...inger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs (2)
166-178: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Refactor to eliminate duplicated logic between mock and real API usage.
The loop and radio-button checks in
UseMockedAPIURLclosely mirror those inUseRealAPIURL. Consider extracting the shared logic into a helper method that takes a boolean parameter or separate actions for mock vs. real mode. This helps maintainability and prevents discrepancies.
180-191: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Refactor to avoid repeating event handler calls.
Similarly,
UseRealAPIURLreplicates much ofUseMockedAPIURLand directly callsxRealAPIRadioButton_Checked(this, e). As previously noted, centralizing this logic reduces duplication and mitigates side effects of manual event invocations.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Ginger/Ginger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs (1)
140-140: Verify that enabling WireMock mapping on subfolders is intended.Enabling
allowWireMockMapping: truefor non-root folders might be correct, but confirm there's no unintended behavior (e.g., incorrectly exposing mock options in subfolders that shouldn't support it).
...inger/SolutionWindows/TreeViewItems/ApplicationModelsTreeItems/AppApiModelsFolderTreeItem.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs (1)
104-104: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionImprove async handling and reduce code duplication.
The method has the following issues:
- Not marked as async despite calling async method
- Duplicated LINQ query for selected models
Apply this diff to improve the code:
- public override void Finish() + public override async Task Finish() { if (DeltaModelsList != null && DeltaModelsList.Count > 0) { // ... existing delta handling code ... } + var selectedModels = General.ConvertListToObservableList( + LearnedAPIModelsList.Where(x => x.IsSelected).ToList()); + if (ToCreateWireMock) { - CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(General.ConvertListToObservableList(LearnedAPIModelsList.Where(x => x.IsSelected).ToList())); + await CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(selectedModels); } - ImportAPIModels(General.ConvertListToObservableList(LearnedAPIModelsList.Where(x => x.IsSelected == true).ToList())); + ImportAPIModels(selectedModels); }Also applies to: 127-132
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs (1)
151-157: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd error handling and progress reporting.
The method should handle errors and report progress for better reliability and user experience.
Apply this diff:
- private async Task CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(ObservableList<ApplicationAPIModel> SelectedAAMList) + private async Task CreateWireMockMappingsAsync(ObservableList<ApplicationAPIModel> selectedModels) { - foreach (ApplicationAPIModel appmodel in SelectedAAMList) + var total = selectedModels.Count; + var current = 0; + + foreach (var model in selectedModels) { - WireMockMappingGenerator.CreateWireMockMapping(appmodel); + try + { + await Task.Run(() => WireMockMappingGenerator.CreateWireMockMapping(model)); + current++; + Reporter.ToLog(eLogLevel.INFO, $"Created WireMock mapping for {model.Name} ({current}/{total})"); + } + catch (Exception ex) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticErrorMessage, + $"Failed to create WireMock mapping for {model.Name}: {ex.Message}"); + } } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs(3 hunks)Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs(5 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs (1)
Learnt from: AmanPrasad43
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#4100
File: Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs:151-157
Timestamp: 2025-02-14T05:46:45.210Z
Learning: WireMock server configuration validation is handled internally by WireMockMappingGenerator when creating mappings, which includes URL validation and error handling.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs (1)
Learnt from: AmanPrasad43
PR: Ginger-Automation/Ginger#4100
File: Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml:28-30
Timestamp: 2025-02-14T07:02:48.416Z
Learning: In AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml, the WireMock mapping checkbox (xWireMockMappingToggle) is initially disabled and only gets enabled after successful validation of WireMock configuration and connection test in the CheckWireMockConfiguration method.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelWizard.cs (2)
23-23: LGTM! Using directives are properly organized.The added using directives for WireMock and Tasks support the new functionality.
Also applies to: 33-33
62-65: LGTM! Property is well-documented and follows conventions.The property follows C# naming conventions and includes clear XML documentation.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs (2)
21-22: LGTM!The added imports are necessary for WireMock configuration and async functionality.
Also applies to: 28-28
43-43: LGTM!The CheckWireMockConfiguration call is correctly placed in the constructor as per requirements.
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Ginger/Ginger/ApplicationModelsLib/APIModels/APIModelWizard/AddAPIModelExtraConfigsPage.xaml.cs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
AmanPrasad43
dismissed stale reviews from coderabbitai[bot] and Maheshkale447
Handled the required and critical comments
Maheshkale447
merged commit c8d32ac
into
Releases/Official-Release
Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Enhancements