Short vs. Octet mismatch #2
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The integration package (correctly) uses
dataOctetwhen mapping to GRbyteports, but the converter was written to usedataShort(incorrect, as it causes issues with Java implementations hence why it is not visible by default in the IDE).Additionally, the converter was adding a single
interfacehard-coded todataShortProvideswith port statistics when it should have an interface specific to the types of ports, and only provide the statistics interface for Provides ports.This patch should sync up the converter to the integration package for handling "byte" data types.