Add absolutely_all short-hand method
#18
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Using a method with several "magic" attributes is very obtuse for
consumers of the gem. Now, instead of executing `.all(nil, {}, true)`
the following can be executed: `.absolutely_all`.
The latter provides more clarity.
This is a separate commit so it can be excluded during merging if desired by the original maintainers.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm finding myself frequently needing entire datasets and invoking the
allmethod as.all(nil, {}, true)which is obtuse.I've provided a simple method with those options predefined to provide clarity to my codebase.