Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow reading and writing structured objects in LLVM analysis #159

Closed
atomb opened this issue Jul 7, 2016 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1015
Closed

Allow reading and writing structured objects in LLVM analysis #159

atomb opened this issue Jul 7, 2016 · 1 comment · Fixed by #1015
Assignees
Labels
type: enhancement Issues describing an improvement to an existing feature or capability

Comments

@atomb
Copy link
Contributor

atomb commented Jul 7, 2016

Right now, arrays of scalars can be read and written from the LLVM heap as monolithic entities. Similarly, it would be possible in principle to specify or extract the value of a struct or a nested array as a SAWCore tuple or nested vector, but that's not currently implemented.

@atomb atomb added the type: enhancement Issues describing an improvement to an existing feature or capability label May 2, 2017
@atomb atomb added this to the 1.0 milestone Jun 4, 2019
@atomb atomb modified the milestones: 0.5, 0.6 Mar 31, 2020
@atomb atomb modified the milestones: 0.6, 0.7 Aug 6, 2020
@atomb atomb removed this from the 0.7 milestone Oct 16, 2020
@brianhuffman brianhuffman added the maybe fixed Issues where there's reason to think they might be fixed but that still requires confirmation label Oct 16, 2020
@brianhuffman brianhuffman self-assigned this Oct 16, 2020
@brianhuffman
Copy link
Contributor

This was indeed already implemented. With the addition of an integration test that uses the feature (#1015) I think we can close the ticket.

@sauclovian-g sauclovian-g removed the maybe fixed Issues where there's reason to think they might be fixed but that still requires confirmation label Oct 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement Issues describing an improvement to an existing feature or capability
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants