Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow building with GHC 9.10 #18

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2024
Merged

Allow building with GHC 9.10 #18

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

RyanGlScott
Copy link
Contributor

All that is required is lifting the upper version bounds on base.

All that is required is lifting the upper version bounds on `base`.
Copy link
Member

@kquick kquick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have no repo-specific CI to update for this. so this should be all that is needed.

We could add CI to this repo, but I would recommend we could defer that until such time (if any) that this repo is under significant development activity where individual build status is valuable. It is currently built as part of What4's CI, which should be sufficient for now.

It's more likely that we would need to add tests for changes in the underlying ABC library, but that would also involve tracking ABC (which doesn't have releases) and triggering builds on ABC changes (I don't believe github supports cross-repo CI actions).

@RyanGlScott
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've opened #19 to track adding CI to this repo.

@RyanGlScott RyanGlScott merged commit f8d96d7 into master Sep 17, 2024
@RyanGlScott RyanGlScott deleted the ghc-9.10 branch September 17, 2024 15:24
RyanGlScott added a commit to GaloisInc/what4 that referenced this pull request Sep 19, 2024
Bump the upper version bounds on `base` in the various `what4` packages, and
bump the `aig` submodule to bring in the changes from
GaloisInc/aig#18.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants