-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Simulation of banks of instruments #10
Comments
I'm not touching this for now because I don't quite understand how it would work. I mean, I understand the idea of changing banks, but I don't know how it would work in the program. I will leave this topic for Thursday's Zoom meeting. |
OK, it only records here what was agreed upon at the meeting. The keys that will offer functionality will be a combination of
This arrangement is motivated by ergonomic accessibility in case of using computer keyboard and lack of available free keys in numeric zone. The combination |
Control+1 to Control+8 (eight)? For step length 8 is very important.
Critical for higher tempos (01/02)
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
…On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 at 10:44, GSoftDev ***@***.***> wrote:
OK, it only records here what was agreed upon at the meeting.
The keys that will offer functionality will be a combination of SHIFT and:
- Q - for bank 1
- W` - for bank 2
- A - for bank 3
- S` - for bank 4
- Z' for bank 5
- X' for bank 6
This arrangement is motivated by ergonomic accessibility in case of using
computer keyboard and lack of available free keys in numeric zone.
The combination CONTROL+1 to 6 will be used for another task.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#10 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AU7UNL377SF6DLW5WS5TPCLT2UJQVANCNFSM5BDDGAKQ>
.
|
It just occurred to me... It's a bit pointless to have these keys to change banks. After all, changing banks is done with a "technical" key on a MIDI device, and instrument change instructions send a different code. You need a different approach here, not the one agreed upon at the meeting. |
Pasting Polish description:
Skoro SFX obsługuje te powiedzmy 64 instrumenty (bo nie pamietam dokładnie), to fajnie by było zasymulować polecenie BankChange.
Powiedzmy, że jeden bank to jest 9 instrumentów. Wtedy bym sobie ułożył isntrumenty obok siebie rodzajami, np. 9 różnych leadów, 9 krótkich dzwieków, 9 różnych rodzajów akordów, 9 instrumentów perkusyjnych, a w przyszłości może również 9 filtrowanych synthów PWM :)
Teraz, ze względu na ilość dostępnych skrótów Shift+Numer mam ulozone obok siebie 10 najbardziej potrzebnych instrumentów. Z symulacją BankChange miałbym o wiele więcej swobody.
Oczywście przy założeniu, że nie wykorzystujemy własnych mapowań do Shift+Numer, tylko, że 1, 11, 21,31, 41, etc to jest zawsze Shift+1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: