Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

linux version #207

Open
pribault opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #210
Open

linux version #207

pribault opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #210
Assignees
@ilyas-gazizov

Comments

@pribault
Copy link

Hi, i don't see linux libraries for the 4.0 version, is it still supported ?
@gaetandezeiraud
Copy link

Same question here.

@oscarbg
Copy link

oscarbg commented May 13, 2020

should be supported still:
"Vulkan: a 64-bit version of Windows® 10 or Linux, and a GPU and drivers that support Vulkan version 1.2"

seems missing a libradeonrays.so file as we have:
libradeonrays.dylib
radeonrays.dll

@pribault
Copy link
Author

I agree, i was asking wondering if it's not more a readme error.

Hi-Angel added a commit to Hi-Angel/RadeonRays_SDK that referenced this issue May 14, 2020
@Hi-Angel
Revert commits 0009e41..17bbad3 inclusive
533bfee 
These commits try bumping the version up to 4.0, but they lack any kind
of changelog, and most importantly, lack the sources. Author just
removed sources, dumped some binaries leaving to at least one major
regression, and somehow that got through

These changes clearly haven't got any peer review and shouldn've have
been applied in the first place. Let's just revert them.

Fixes: GPUOpen-LibrariesAndSDKs#206
Fixes: GPUOpen-LibrariesAndSDKs#207

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Kharlamov <[email protected]>
Hi-Angel added a commit to Hi-Angel/RadeonRays_SDK that referenced this issue May 14, 2020
@Hi-Angel
Revert commits 0009e41..17bbad3 inclusive
cc62e8d 
These commits try bumping the version up to 4.0, but they lack any kind
of changelog, and most importantly, lack the sources. Yeah, that does
sound funny but this is for real: author just removed sources, dumped
some binaries leading to at least one major regression, and somehow all
of that got through.

These changes clearly haven't got any peer review and shouldn've have
been applied in the first place. Let's just revert them.

Fixes: GPUOpen-LibrariesAndSDKs#206
Fixes: GPUOpen-LibrariesAndSDKs#207

Signed-off-by: Konstantin Kharlamov <[email protected]>
@Hi-Angel Hi-Angel linked a pull request May 14, 2020 that will close this issue
Open
@ilyas-gazizov
Copy link

ilyas-gazizov commented May 14, 2020 •
edited
Loading

We are going to update the library soon so it will contain necessary .so files.

@yozhijk yozhijk assigned yozhijk and ilyas-gazizov and unassigned yozhijk May 15, 2020
@oscarbg
Copy link

oscarbg commented May 29, 2020

any update on this?

@d-croft
Copy link

d-croft commented Dec 17, 2020

Is "soon" the same soon the second blue company (not IBM) wanted to release microcode patches?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ilyas-gazizov ilyas-gazizov

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Revert commits 0009e41..17bbad3 inclusive Hi-Angel/RadeonRays_SDK
6 participants
@oscarbg @gaetandezeiraud @yozhijk @ilyas-gazizov @pribault @d-croft