Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: increase coverage of PrivateKeyVault #906

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 18, 2023
Merged

test: increase coverage of PrivateKeyVault #906

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 18, 2023

Conversation

danielbate
Copy link
Member

Closes #905

Add missing coverage of getWallet() throw condition and update language style of test descriptions

Torres-ssf
Torres-ssf previously approved these changes Apr 18, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@Torres-ssf Torres-ssf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good stuff @danielbate 👍

I am just not completely sure about the changeset. I am under the impression that it needs to be empty for cases like this one. Is my impression correct, team @FuelLabs/sdk-ts ?

@arboleya
Copy link
Member

@Torres-ssf Precisely, we don't want to bump versions unless changes are introduced to the source code.

@danielbate You can empty the changeset manually:

---
---

Example:

.changeset/wet-glasses-draw.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Anderson Arboleya <[email protected]>
@danielbate danielbate merged commit d2242dc into FuelLabs:master Apr 18, 2023
@danielbate danielbate deleted the test/increase-coverage-of-private-key-vault branch April 18, 2023 18:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Increase test coverage of PrivatekeyVault
4 participants