-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
updates in methods, related to folder paths #149
Comments
@atherdon from which way we need to list methods? may you clarify it a bit, please? |
i've read the readme but it was inexplicit for me |
@atherdon may you explain a bit, please? |
@svr8 can you advise here? |
Considering the files inside |
@atherdon i think this is a bit complex task for me, may you change it for me, please? |
@svr8 maybe you can help with this task. first we need to have a list of methods that have paths. |
Here is a list of files:
|
thanks! this is what I need.
I'm a bit busy right now. if you need a task - please take a look around
and find something.
… |
@IamRaviTejaG check this task and tell me if you think you can improve our methods |
@atherdon
const dataStr = stripSymbols(data); writeFile(path, dataStr, (err) => { |
alright - can you open a pull request with code changes so i can look into it? |
Yes! Will sync my fork and send you a pull request
…Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 5, 2019, at 12:28 AM, Arthur Tkachenko ***@***.***> wrote:
alright - can you open a pull request with code changes so i can look into it?
don't forget your fork, because we made some configuration changes
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
first of all - run audit is not really necessary.
because we have 3rd party service that updating packages for us, so i'm
pretty confident that audit wouldn't return any major issues.
your `npm install` completed without any errors. i think all is working
fine.
if you want to make a local build, run `npm run build` and you'll see our
bundler output
… |
isValid(path)added in fileSystem/write method (#149)
i have a question. i'm a bit confused. we have a method inside of our src folder. named like |
is-valid-path checks for any invalid characters in the path whereas
isFolderExist i.e..(existSync(path)) will check if a folder is already
exist. So
I think in makeFolder method, it is better if we first use is-valid-path to
check for any invalid characters in the path(argument) first and then call
the existSync()
to see if the folder is already exist or not.
…On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:15 AM Arthur Tkachenko ***@***.***> wrote:
i have a question. i'm a bit confused. we have a method inside of our src
folder. named like isFolderExist.
is it work differently from is-valid-path?
should we use both of them or just use only one?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#149>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD4BZMZZTRIAFWNUISGKOWTQJCLJNANCNFSM4IDRTWKQ>
.
|
now it's more clear for me ok show me the code - we'll also add some tests
that will help us with catching some bugs
… |
can you push your changes and open a pull request, so I can checkout it locally and take a look? |
can you take a look at this task and explore was it completed or not @Edebo ? |
ok |
updates in methods, related to folder paths #149
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We have a lot of methods here that work with folder paths or file paths.
my concern is - we can easily broke them, by passing anything else that path related.
#13
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: