This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
Update described result from createModel api #377
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I have been working on a wrapper for anki-connect in go. It serializes the requests into a typed Go struct. To create these structs I have been using the types present in the provided examples of api results. It looks like the format of the id for createModel result has either changed, or was entered wrong. See dlangevi/ankiconnect@f3e9a5b for an example of what the current version of anki + anki-connect returns for this api call
Update described result from createModel api
|
Cool, I love Go :) Thanks for the fix! |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have been working on a wrapper for anki-connect in go. It serializes the requests into a typed Go struct. To create these structs I have been using the types present in the provided examples of api results. It looks like the format of the id for createModel result has either changed, or was entered wrong. See dlangevi/ankiconnect@f3e9a5b for an example of what the current version of anki + anki-connect returns for this api call