-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
856: Make PackageCompiler happy r=DhairyaLGandhi a=DhairyaLGandhi Co-authored-by: Dhairya Gandhi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Dhairya Gandhi <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
Showing
3 changed files
with
6 additions
and
7 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ | ||
using InteractiveUtils | ||
|
||
function pow(x, n) | ||
r = 1 | ||
while n > 0 | ||
|
4fdb691
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@JuliaRegistrator register()
4fdb691
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Registration pull request created: JuliaRegistries/General/26713
After the above pull request is merged, it is recommended that a tag is created on this repository for the registered package version.
This will be done automatically if the Julia TagBot GitHub Action is installed, or can be done manually through the github interface, or via:
4fdb691
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is pushing for a breaking release?
4fdb691
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, we removed NNlib's rules
4fdb691
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We shouldn't be doing breaking releases without a proper review or when it's not necessary.
In this case, the PR that requests the tag should be relying on a manifest file to run CI, not have a breaking release which can break user code. That makes things feel so much less robust.