Contributor's Guide draft

[lilianabs]

@logankilpatrick, @DhairyaLGandhi can you please have a look at this first draft? Some sections are incomplete and it'd be very helpful if you could give me some feedback on the current content :)

[logankilpatrick]

This is an awesome first pass!! Nothing big jumps out at me as having to be addressed so far. Any additional thoughts @DhairyaLGandhi ?

[darsnack]

Just some minor changes. This is amazing, thank you!

[DhairyaLGandhi]

I get the sense that we need to give more emphasis to writing tutorials and models in addition to the core functionality. We should also talk about the information to be included in an issue and PR and how to present it best. One is to limit PRs to make only the necessary changes, and write motivating tests before hand.

[DhairyaLGandhi]

Thanks for tackling this! This is shaping up really well. I've left a few thoughts on the document so far.

[DhairyaLGandhi]

Should link to the appropriate sections.

[lilianabs]

Links fixed. Just a question: does it makes sense to have the section Flux source code organisation? I haven't finished that section and just wondering if it's worth it.

[lilianabs]

@logankilpatrick, @DhairyaLGandhi, @darsnack I've added the suggestions. Could you please have a look at the section Flux source code organization and comment on it. Do you think is worth having it?

[darsnack]

Looks good to me!

[lilianabs]

Updated :)

[darsnack]

Thank you @lilianabs!